Consumer behavior – Core
Summary
Lecture 1
Consumer behavior is:
1. Obtaining
2. Consuming
3. Disposing
Projection bias / false consensus: We overestimate how much other people agree with us.
Confirmation bias: We focus on confirming our beliefs. We are resistant to changing our beliefs.
Self-serving bias: We are likelier to attribute positive aspects to ourselves whilst attributing negative
aspects to external factors.
The study of consumer behavior follows a cycle of the following phases: (ILPDDW)
1. Identification of research problem
2. Literature/study review
3. Problem definition/research plan
4. Data collection
5. Data analysis/interpretation
6. Writing and evaluating the research
Methods of studying are:
1. Surveying / interviewing
2. Experimenting
Avoid self-reports by:
1. Analyzing choices
2. Implicit association test (IAT)
3. Eye tracking
Keep in mind when studying consumer behavior:
Beware of common sense avoid oversimplified/incorrect assumptions
Nature of relationship: causal or correlational?
CB is a social science: reducing uncertainty rather than establishing certainty
Qualitative data is richer, but more costly to analyze
,Lecture 2
Different research strategies in consumer behavior:
Descriptive
o Obtains a snapshot (a description) of specific characteristics of a specific group of
individuals.
o For example: a political poll.
Correlational
o Examine relationship between variables.
o Relationships between variables may be:
Linear
Curvilinear
Positive
Negative
o Relations between variables can be defined in correlation coefficients.
‘+’ indicates a positive correlation.
‘-‘ indicates a negative correlation.
A value between 0.0 and 1.0 indicates the strength of the correlation.
Experimental
o Researchers randomly assign participants into conditions.
o Answers cause-and-effect questions about the relationship between two variables.
Quasi-experimental
o Participants self-assign themselves into conditions.
o Almost, but not quite, experiments – can never produce an unambiguous explanation.
Nonexperimental
o Participants have been assigned into conditions before the start of research (e.g.:
gender).
o Involves two groups of scores and focuses on the difference between groups.
o Demonstrates a relationship between variables – does not attempt to explain it.
Terminology for research:
Independent variable (IV): Variable manipulated by the researcher.
o Levels: Different values or settings of the IV to define treatment conditions.
o Condition: The specific setting influenced by the IV's levels.
Dependent variable (DV): Variable observed to assess effects of the IV's manipulation.
Moderator variable: A variable that influences (strengthens or weakens) an effect between two
other variables. Answers the question: “When does A affect B? Answer: C”.
Mediator variable: A variable that is influenced by one variable, and in turn influences the next.
Answers the question: “How does A affect C? Answer: B”.
Extraneous variables: All variables in the study other than the IV and DV that could affect the
outcome.
Confounding variables: Are outside variables that changes the effect that is being researched. It
can change the outcome of the study and is thus a threat to internal validity.
, Factor: an independent variable (IV) in an experiment (especially experiments that include two or more
IVs).
Factorial design: a research design that includes two or more factors (IVs)
A single-factor design has one IV
A two-factor design has two IVs
A two-factor design with two IVs each one having two levels is called a
2x2 design.
A two-factor design with two IVs one having two levels and the other
one three levels is called a 2x3 design etc.
A 2x3x2 design is a three-factor design with a total of 12 conditions etc.
Graphing the results of a two-factor study:
No interaction Interaction indicated
Note: A statistical test is needed to determine whether the interaction is significant
External validity:
The extent to which the results of a research study can be generalized.
A threat to external validity: Any characteristic of a study that limits the ability to generalize the
study’s results.
Different kinds of generalization can involve threats to external validity:
o Generalization from a sample to the general population.
o Generalization from one research study to another.
o Generalization from a research study to a real-world situation.
Internal validity:
Concerned with factors in the research study that raise doubts or questions about the
interpretation of the results
A research study with internal validity
o Produces a single, unambiguous explanation for the relationship between two variables
Threat to internal validity
o Any factor that allows an alternative explanation for the results
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hedwigluten. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.58. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.