100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
cj 485 midterm 1 Questions with 100% Actual correct answers | verified | latest update | Graded A+ | Already Passed | Complete Solution $7.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

cj 485 midterm 1 Questions with 100% Actual correct answers | verified | latest update | Graded A+ | Already Passed | Complete Solution

 3 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

cj 485 midterm 1 Questions with 100% Actual correct answers | verified | latest update | Graded A+ | Already Passed | Complete Solution

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • June 27, 2024
  • 5
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
cj 485 midterm 1
opinion - ANS-majority = law
dissent = disagree
concurrence = agree

Jurisdiction - ANS-to have power over

stare decisis - ANS-Let the decision stand; decisions are based on precedents from previous
cases

rule - ANS-courts are bound by rules from case law on the same issues

exceptions: distinguishing facts - ANS-arguing how new case facts are different than the original

exceptions: outranking court - ANS-supreme court over appeals over trial/district courts

exceptions: dictum/dicta - ANS-on a tangent; not relevant to the case

(F)IRAC ~legal analysis~ - ANS-(F)facts
I: Issue, question presented
R: Rule, from statute/case/constitution
A: analysis, applying general to specific
C: conclusion "holding"

Amendment IV - ANS-free of unreasonable search and seizure

Amendment V - ANS-No person shall be ... compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...

Amendment XIV (14) - ANS-Due process, equal protection, privileges of citizens

application - ANS-is it a search or a seizure

violation - ANS-is the search/seizure unreasonable/unlawful, was their a warrant/warrant
requirement

remedies - ANS-exclusionary rule= main remedy
alternatives= lawsuit, apology, retrial

Testimonial Evidence - ANS-what is said in court/ in interrogation by a competent witness

, Real/Physical Evidence - ANS-does not reveal the contents of the mind ex. shoe size photos,
handwriting, voice examplars

"The Cruel Trilemma" - ANS-- Refers to the situation faced by a suspect during interrogation,
not liked by courts
- they talk, they incriminate themselves(self accusation)
- they remain silent, they look guilty(contempt)
- they lie, they face charges(perjury)

· 4A searches - ANS-indirect or direct government intrusion of a reasonable expectation of
privacy, typically need a warrant to search without probable cause or emergency status

4A seizures - ANS-items taken with meaningful interference of the government
-items subject to seizure:
fruits of crime, instrumentalities of crime, contraband "mere evidence"
destroying property

plain view search - ANS-not a 4A search because their is no government intrusion, the right of
the police to gather without a warrant evidence that is clearly visible

Plain View Seizures - ANS-if an investigator/officer is lawfully in a place and sees contraband or
evidence in plain view, the investigator may seize the evidence and it will be admissible, is a 4A
seizure, needs to be reasonable

Mapp v. Ohio (1961) - ANS-Established exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be
used in court; Warren Court's judicial activism.

Schmerber v. California - ANS-The forced extraction and analysis of a blood sample is not
compelled testimony and therefore does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against
self-incrimination.
Intrusions into the human body require a warrant
Here, the warrant-less blood test was permissible under the exigent circumstances exception to
prevent the destruction of alcohol in the blood stream through the body's natural metabolic
processes
-Apply? yes, blood taken by doctor directed by the police (gov)
-violation? no, emergency status of evidence collection due to destruction (BAC goes down)

Rochin v. California (1952) - ANS-Police have stomach of perp pumped
-apply? yes, gov has doc pump stomach
-violation? yes, shocks conscience of court

Breithaupt v. Abram (1957) - ANS-The search was reasonable. The methods used did not
involve Rochin-type coercion or brutality.
apply? yes, gov had blood taken w out consent

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Hkane. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart