100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
MT5 Industrial Organization & Competition Policy Notes $7.39   Add to cart

Class notes

MT5 Industrial Organization & Competition Policy Notes

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

These notes were prepared based on the lectures and supplemented by information from textbooks and tutorials where parts of the lecture were unclear. Graphs, equations, and bullet-point explanations included. Prepared by a first class Economics and Management student for the FHS Microeconomics pape...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 20  pages

  • June 27, 2024
  • 20
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Simon cowan
  • Mt5 industrial organization & competition policy
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
MT5 Industrial Organization & Competition Policy
Lecture 12: Application to Industrial Organisation
Competition with Market Power
 Types of competition
o Perfect competition (many firms): Profit is competed away
o Monopoly (one firm): Significant profits
o Most industries: Few firms (but more than one)- we will focus on this
 Can firms earn profits in concentrated industries?
 How does this depend on the nature of the competition?
 Strategic decision-making: Optimal decision depends on other firms’ choices

Bertrand Competition (Benchmark model, price-setting)
 In Bertrand competition, there is price competition with homogeneous products
 Setting it up
o Two firms
o Identical products (perfect substitutes), same marginal cost c
 Assume c = 0. (this assumption is not key to the model)
o Each firm i chooses a price pi ≥ 0.
 We assume firms choose a fixed price (pure strategy) not a probabilistic
selection of price (mixed strategy)
o If both choose the same price, demand is split equally between them
 Since consumers are indifferent between the firms
o If one firm sets a lower price, all the demand goes to that firm
 In this model, Nash equilibrium P1 = P2 = c is eventually reached
o Let Q = 180 − 2P, so P = 90 − 0.5Q.
o The monopoly price is £45.
 Monopoly maximises Q*(P – c) = QP = 180P − 2P 2.
 At optimum, 180 – 4P = 0 → P = 45
o Best response for firm 1 in price setting given firm 2’s price:
 If P2 > £45 then set P1 = £45 (get all the demand and monopoly profit)
 If 45 > P2 > 0, say P2 =£10, then set P1 just below P2 (P1 = £9.99).
 Otherwise, if P1 > £10, you’d earn 0
 If you set P1 = £10, you’d earn (A+B). Setting P1 = £9.99 earns you (2B +
E). Your profit for P1 = £9.99 is more by (B+ E – A > 0).





 Setting slightly below is better in general even if the demand curve was
not sloping down (no gain in E). This is because loss of A << gain in B.

, o Knowing this, firm 2 will undercut, which causes firm 1 to undercut, and this means the
unique Nash equilibrium in pure strategies (with prices being continuous) is P 1 = P2 = c.
o Bertrand paradox: the competitive outcome arises with only two firms

 Why is {c, c} an equilibrium?
o Suppose P2 = c, and firm 1 sets P1 > P2. It still earns 0.
o Suppose instead P1 < P2 = c. Then firm 1 makes a loss. (Captures the market but loses in
each sale)
o Payoff for firm 1 when P1 = c is at least as high as with any other price.
o Same reasoning applies for firm 2. No individually profitable deviations
 Why is the {c, c} equilibrium unique?
o Suppose there’s another equilibrium at a different common price. If P 1 = P2 > c then a
firm benefits by undercutting.
o If P1 = P2 < c then a firm benefits by raising its price (lose less)
 If instead prices can only be set in discrete units, eg. whole pennies, then there can be another
equilibrium. In the example there would be two equilibria: {c, c} and {c+0.01, c+0.01}
o Profits = 0 if you lower price to c or raise it above c+0.01
o No individually profitable deviations, so it is an equilibrium. Some profits made.

 Resolving the Bertrand paradox: what if the situation were slightly different?
o Benchmark model assumes that firms can supply any quantity to the market.
 What if firms choose the quantity that they supply to the market?
o Benchmark model assumes products are perfect substitutes.
 What if products are differentiated?
o Benchmark model assumes firms interact only once.
 What if firms interact repeatedly?

Cournot Competition (quantity setting)
 Setting it up
o There are two firms
o Products are identical (homogeneous goods)
o Firms compete by choosing a quantity to supply to the market
o Price adjusts to clear the market
o Assume that demand is linear:
 P(Q) = a − bQ where Q = q1 + q2 and b > 0.
 Linearity of demand is important for this model, unlike for Bertrand
o Marginal cost is c ≥ 0, there are no fixed costs, and a > c.
 No fixed cost assumption not important for the model. Just to make our
examples easier
 a > c so a market exists (otherwise max. WTP < marginal cost, no market)
o Profit for firm i = 1, 2 is π(qi, qj) = (P(Q) − c)*qi
 Deriving Cournot Nash Equilibrium
o Taking the quantity qj of the other firm as given, firm i's best response BR i(qj) is to
choose qi to maximize profits π(qi, qj)

, o π(qi, qj) = (a − b(qi + qj) − c)qi.

o FOC:

o SOC: (∴ maximum profit point)
o From FOC, BRi(qj) = (a − c − bqj)/(2b)


o Solving this system of equations gives the Nash equilibrium



o Best response is decreasing in the action of the rival: If competitor becomes more
aggressive (produces more), firm backs down (produces less).




o
 How Does this Compare to Perfect Competition & Monopoly?
o If firms behaved as if they were a monopoly they would choose Q to maximise profit =
(P(Q) − c)*Q = (a − bQ − c)*Q
 FOC: a – 2bQ – c = 0
 ∴ Q = (a − c)/(2b), P = c + 0.5(a − c)

 π = (P – c)*Q =
o If firms behaved as if they were perfect competitors, then they would produce a total
quantity Q such that P(Q) = c
 ∴ Q = (a − c)/b, P = c
 π=0
o Profit under Cournot is higher than in competitive equilibrium but lower than under
monopoly. Profit under Cournot:

 ,



 Aggregate profit: (less than monopoly profit)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ib45pointer. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.39
  • (0)
  Add to cart