100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
full summary notes of OCR Religious Studies paper 2 $20.21   Add to cart

Summary

full summary notes of OCR Religious Studies paper 2

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

topis-by-topic full notes of Religious Studies paper 2 for revision and active recall, broken down and comprehensively listed

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

  • June 27, 2024
  • 14
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
ETHICS PAPER 2 – REVISION

2.1 NATURAL LAW

St Thomas Aquinas- human conduct must follow certain principles found in natural ORDER –

- COGNITIVE REALIST APPROACH
- ‘ semi-official doctrine of the Catholic Church’- Peter Singer

‘right and wrong’/ ‘true or false’-

NATURAL MORAL LAW IS ‘RIGHT REASON IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATURE’ (Cicero) – a cognitive realist
point of view

SYNDERESIS RULEà ‘GOOD IS TO BE DONE AND EVIL IS TO BE AVOIDED’ – THOMAS AQUINAS, SUMMA
THEOLOGICA

RATIO – reason placed in every person as a result of being created in the image of God
CONSCIENTIA- a person’ reason making moral judgements

Vincible ignorance- lack of knowledge for which a person is responsible

Invincible ignorance- lack of knowledge for which a person is not responsible

^ AQUINAS’ THEOLOGICAL APPROACH



St PAUL- wrote in Romans that law is ‘written at the heart of the Gentiles’

AHLUWALIA- liked NML as he believed it combined faith with reason

DEONTOLOGICAL (DUTY-BASED) Theory- concerned with human ACTION and not the
result/consequence

- NML has had a big impact on Catholic teaching and NATURALISM- the idea that absolute right and
wrong lies inherently in nature
- Supporters of this being:
- HUGH GROTIUS
- WILLIAM PALEY
- JOHN LOCKE
- ARISTOTLE

Aquinas, like Aristotle, believed in a ‘telos’/ ‘purpose’, and that we should act in a way to achieve
GOODNESS – with the end goal being Aristotelian Eudaimonia

This kind of happiness could not occur on earth, but once UNITED WITH GOD

- AQUINAS- HIERACHY OF LAW, FORMING THE ‘NATURAL ORDER’
- ETERNAL LAW ( part of God, universal and absolute, applies to EVEYONE) à DIVINE LAW ( laws and
rules found in the BIBLE) à NATURAL LAW ( humans learning about God through the Natural World)
à HUMAN LAW ( derived from Natural and Divine Law)
- These laws are inherently in accordance with eachother

Deontological- relies on a supposed inherent human desire to DO GOOD AND AVOID EVIL

Had 5 primary precepts which stem off into an infinite number of secondary precepts:

5 fundamentals:

1) Preservation of life
2) Ordered society
3) Worship God
4) Education
5) Procreation



1

, While making decisions humans must choose whether or not their reasoning UPHOLDS primary
precept, and in doing so create SECONDARY precepts

This deontological approach may link to Kant, who looks at The Good Will, and being honest and not
taking advantage of others

ASPECTS- NML DISCUSSION POINTS

- Is a FIXED ethical foundation, there is no room for subjectivity- its cognitive outlook of an absolute
true/ false is definite, but equally might be restrictive
- Supports human rights in the primary precepts-
- But the framework is substantially vulnerable due to it relying on an inherent human desire to do
GOOD-
- POPE BENEDICT XVI- NML provides a counterbalance to the materialistic and hedonistic trends of
modern society

Which brings forth a NUANCE:à ARE HUMANS INHERENTLY GOOD? à see Hobbes vs Rousseau debate.
L’homme sauvage, man is ‘brutish’, vs tabula rasa, aka ‘blank slate’

There are certain things which the majority of humans see as universally and socially unacceptable,
e.g. murder, violence, etc.

UNHELPFULà

- Aquinas’ precepts based on belief in God
- Ignores the complexity of humans, e.g. assumes we are all heterosexual
- NIELSEN- NML makes the mistake of assuming all humans are similar and working to the same ‘end’
- BARTH- argues that NML limits what humans can do and what God can do- because of the fall,
human nature is damaged and depraved- the spiritual connection is too broken and therefore NML
cannot be used to make moral decisions as it relies too much on there being a really close
relationship with God
- Arguably out of date and ignores what is socially acceptable nowadays, e.g. the Protestants
rejected NML, Martin Luther found it was too out of touch with the modern day
- Relies on COGNITIVISM’
- AUGUSTINE- ‘Lex Injusta Non Est Lex’

MOORE’s NATURALISTIC FALLACY- believes naturalistic ethics falls on a conceptual mistake as just
because nature follows a particular path does not mean we have to follow the same path, we cannot
assume the presence of a ‘telos’

In TURN WITH HUME’S IS-OUGHT PROBLEM:

We can’t jump from observational / a posteriori ‘is’ statements to what ‘ought’ to be

-

ALTERNATIVELY, EMOTIVISM might provide a better framework as a non-cognitivist idea, down to
situational moral judgement

CRITICISNSà is-ought problem

‘ The obedient must be slaves’- Henry David Thoreau




2.2 SITUATION ETHICS

Joseph Fletcher is the main proponent of this- 1905-1991

2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rachelbrooks9. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $20.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$20.21
  • (0)
  Add to cart