Exam (elaborations)
MRL3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024
- Course
- Institution
MRL3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
mpumeleloh
Reviews received
Content preview
MRL3701Assignment 1
Semester 2 2024
- DUE 30 August
2024
QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS
[School]
[Course title]
, MRL3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024
See the table below and match the columns to answer the following questions.
You must therefore answer the question as follows on your answer sheet (see
ONLY AN EXAMPLE below) and do so for every question (a) – (e). (a)
1. Case name: Ex Parte Snooke 2014 (5) SA 426 (FB)
2. Ratio decidendi of the case: This was an application for rehabilitation. Several
cases of abuses of the sequestration process. Attorneys should limit their fees and
expenses to those stated in application and trustees may not consent to taxation of
attorney's bill without it. The effects of rehabilitation in terms of s 124(3), if the
order is granted, is to reinvest insolvent with his estate.
3. Area of Insolvency Law applicable: Rehabilitation and abuse of sequestration
proceedings. MRL3701 Assessment 1 Semester 2 2024 3 Case Name: Ratio
decidendi of the case: Area of Insolvency Law applicable:
(a) Amod v Khan 1947 (2) SA 432 (N) The relief sought in a sequestration
application is directed at diminishing the legal status and capacity of a particular
individual debtor, so it should pertain to that debtor’s circumstances only. Section
9 (4A) of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936.
(b) Ex Parte Arntzen (Nedbank Ltd as Intervening Creditor) 2013 (1) SA 49 (KZP)
The definition of “employees” in section 9(4A) includes all employees, as well as
domestic employees. Compulsory Sequestration.
(c) Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300(CC) Even when all the requirements of
section 12 were complied with, the court retained its discretion to grant or refuse a
sequestration order. Voluntary surrender of two individuals (in one application).
(d) Strutfast (Pty) Ltd v Uys 2017 (6) SA 491 (GJ) The court confirmed that
voluntary surrender applications must comply with the provisions in s 6(1) of the
Act and the court must be satisfied that it will be to the advantage of creditors if the
debtor’s estate is surrendered. Section 21 Insolvency Act 24 of 1936.
(e) Stratford v Investec Bank Ltd 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC) Section 21 did not infringe
the constitutional provisions and the temporary divestment of the solvent spouse
was merely to ensure that the insolvent estate was not deprived of property to
which it was entitled. Sections 3-6 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mpumeleloh. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.84. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67866 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now