Other
Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 214 - ALL cases
- Course
- Institution
This is a summary of all the cases needed to expand on for A1 and A2/A3.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
tessarothman
Reviews received
Content preview
Mattel & MGAProblems – breach of contract and copyright infringement
Mattel sued MGA and Bryant for breach of contract and copyright infringement
Bryant agreed to assign all of his “inventions” to Mattel whilst he was employed for them
He conceived the Bratz doll idea whilst employed by Mattel
Can an idea (Bratz doll) be classified as an invention that belongs to the employer?
In a contract it must be specific about who “owns” what ideas and when an invention is an
employees or an employers.
There was ambiguity in Bryant’s employment contract
MGA already put a lot of time into the Bratz doll and made a lot of money so it would be hard to
revoke their ownership rights
IBM & Apple (Papermaster)
Problems – non compete agreement (will not work for a competitor or compete with an employer)
and non-disclosure agreement. (of trade secrets)
IBM sued Papermaster for allegedly violating the terms of non-compete agreement, alleging that
Papermaster would be in a position to divulge important IBM trade secrets.
Settlement agreement: can’t work for rival for 6 months, non-disclosure agreement for 1 year after
exiting.
Microsoft and former employee
Microsoft sued a former employee for allegedly lying when applying for a job and stealing trade
secrets.
Muller stated on application that he no longer worked for Ancora Technologies and it no longer
existed meanwhile it did and he was the chief executive.
He was hired as a program manager and downloaded confidential documents onto his company
laptop – to get evidence of the infringement of his patent
He hid his tracks by deleting the files. Then, Ancora sued Dell, HP and Toshiba for using their
Microsoft technology which violated the Ancora patent.
Mullor was fired. Mullor already applied for his patent before working for Microsoft. When he was
working for Microsoft, they developed a technology which is subject to the patent lawsuit. He tried
to license the technology to them but they said no.
The Microsoft lawsuit accuses Mullor of breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets and
fraud.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tessarothman. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.92. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
84251 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now