100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A* Early Tudors Henry VIII Exemplar Essay 7 $4.50   Add to cart

Essay

A* Early Tudors Henry VIII Exemplar Essay 7

1 review
 258 views  4 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Assess the effectiveness of Henry VIII’s government in dealing with opposition to the religious changes from .

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • September 18, 2019
  • 2
  • 2018/2019
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • Unknown

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: ishaghosh2810 • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
Henry VIII practice essay 7



Assess the effectiveness of Henry VIII’s government in dealing with opposition to the religious
changes from 1529-1547



The overall effectiveness of Henry VIII’s government in dealing with opposition to the
religious changes from 1529-1547 can be measured by the unquestionable royal supremacy which
existed at the time of the king’s death and the lack of credible threats to reverse the changes.
Despite this, the reversion towards Catholic doctrine in the 1540s suggests that the conservatives
did have some success, a view further supported by the execution of ‘the architect of the
Reformation’, Sir Thomas Cromwell.

Among the commons, the effectiveness of Henry VIII’s government in dealing with the
opposition to religious changes is not in dispute. On the surface, the Pilgrimage of Grace appears as
a considerable threat to the royal supremacy; some 40,000 people revolted against the dissolution
of the monasteries in Lincolnshire, Yorkshire, Westmorland and Cumberland. The size and
geographical scale of the rebellion did shock Henry, and for a while the dissolution process was
halted. However, the revolt was limited to the northern counties and thus never threatened the king
directly. The leanings of these areas to more traditional forms of worship were completely ignored
by the government, who moved forward with the dissolution policies once the revolt was crushed. In
fact, Cromwell increased the rate at which the monasteries were dissolved, issuing the Act for the
Dissolution of the Larger Monasteries immediately after the rebellion as a sign that opposition would
never succeed under his premiership. The piecemeal process adopted by Cromwell not only with
regards to dissolving the monasteries but throughout the Reformation was extremely effective,
ensuring that opposition would not mount with each change and reach an extent where it would
genuinely threaten the government. Cromwell had great success in dealing with opposition because
he methodically planned how the religious changes would take place; he crucially went about
securing the submission of Convocation before the gentry and the commons could have their say. As
a result of legislation such as the Submission of the Clergy, both the higher and lower orders had no
choice but to follow the lead of the Church in accepting Henry’s supremacy to direct religious
change. This meant that throughout the Reformation, the government had the law on their side,
which enabled anyone who opposed them to be labelled as criminals. Given the nature of
punishments in this early modern era of the state, this was a strong deterrence for even the most
staunch opponents, and so opposition was largely pre-empted and defeated before it could manifest
properly by the government.

Cromwell’s use of Parliament was another crucial reason why opposition to the religious
changes could be dealt with so effectively. The use of Parliament went hand in hand with forcing the
clergy to swear the Oath of Supremacy to the king, as Cromwell managed to get the Treason Act
passed through Parliament. The apparent support of Parliament for the law (by approving it) gave
the religious changes made by Henry’s government the stamp of legitimacy and democracy, which
subsequently meant that those who opposed the Reformation could be deemed enemies of the
people’s will. The Treason Act proved consequential in dealing with the two most important
dissidents to the religious changes – Sir Thomas More and Bishop John Fisher. Fisher was the only
bishop in Convocation who opposed the anti-Catholic legislation passed in the 1530s, suggesting that
opposition to the Reformation was indeed a minimal threat and not serious. In any case, the

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller thomasbaines0. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.50  4x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart