100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LPL4802 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024 (287381) - DUE 16 August 2024 $2.85   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LPL4802 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024 (287381) - DUE 16 August 2024

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

LPL4802 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024 QUSTIONS WITH ANSWERS

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • July 18, 2024
  • 5
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
LPL4802 Assignment
1 Semester 2 2024
(287381) - DUE 16
August 2024
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS




[School]
[Course title]

, LPL4802 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2024 (287381) - DUE 16 August 2024



Critically discuss the decision of Mdlekeza v Gallie 2021 (4) 531 (wcc) with
specific reference to defamation and the claim for damages in that respect. Do not
include a discussion of the Prescription Act. Your discussion should include (but
not limited to) what constitutes defamation and how the court dealt with this in
casu, the two-stage inquiry, mitigating and aggravating factors. You should include
your personal view of the decision in casu and provide reasons for your view.

The decision of Mdlekeza v Gallie 2021 (4) 531 (WCC) is significant in the
context of defamation law and the claim for damages. Below, we will critically
discuss this case with specific reference to defamation and the claim for damages,
covering what constitutes defamation, how the court handled it, the two-stage
inquiry, and mitigating and aggravating factors. A personal view of the decision
will also be provided.

What Constitutes Defamation

Defamation in South African law involves the wrongful and intentional publication
of defamatory material concerning the plaintiff, which tends to lower the plaintiff's
reputation in the eyes of right-thinking members of society. Defamation is based
on the following elements:

1. Publication: The statement must be made to a third party.

2. Defamatory Matter: The content must be harmful to the plaintiff's
reputation.

3. Reference to the Plaintiff: The defamatory statement must refer to the
plaintiff.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mpumeleloh. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.85. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.85
  • (0)
  Add to cart