100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary final exam 7U9X0 / 7U0B20 $8.57   Add to cart

Class notes

Summary final exam 7U9X0 / 7U0B20

 8 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This document contains a full summary in order to prepare for the final exam for the course Research and Statistics 7U9X0 (old form) - Quantitative Research Methods and Statistics 7U0B20 (new form).

Preview 3 out of 18  pages

  • July 19, 2024
  • 18
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • Theo arentze
  • All classes
avatar-seller
REASERCH AND STATISTICS (7U9X0)
RESEARCH METHODS


PROBLEM FORMULATION


Formulation of the research objective
- A problem has been identified
- Research cannot solve the problem, but will increase the knowledge about the problem
and the possible solutions
- Which can lead to the best solution for the problem


Part I: research objective
- Why is the research needed?
- For what purpose will the knowledge from your research be used?
o Related to the recommendations -> how to act?
- Without objective it is difficult to make choices in research


Part II: research question
- This question is about knowledge
o Which new knowledge should be generated?
- Formulation as a question (with question mark at the end)
o The objective is a statement, not a question
- The research question is accompanied with 2 or more subquestions
o Subquestions are the components of the main question that need to be answered
- Types of research questions:
o Frequency questions – how many, how often
o Difference questions – is there a difference between … (e.g. 2 groups, 2
instruments etc.)
o Relation questions – is there a relation between …



 Positive correlation
 High scores on 1 variable often go together with high scores on the
other one (and low scores with low scores)
 E.g. weight of car <+> fuel consumption
 Negative correlation
 High scores on 1 variable often go together with low scores on the
other one
 E.g. price <-> willingness to purchase a project // year of introduction
of car model <-> fuel consumption

,CONCEPTUAL MODEL


Assumed relationships between variables
- What? – which variables must be considered
- How? – are the variables related to each other? Based on theory/experience/literature etc.
- Function? – helps formulate hypothesis and specific research questions -> determines
which analyses are conducted
Some guidelines for determining a conceptual model
- The unit of analysis - all variables should have the same unit of analysis
- Relationships – links represent causal relationships AND all boxes represent varieties
o X happens earlier in time than Y and X has an influence on Y
- There must be a correspondence between the conceptual model and the research
questions
1. The dependent variable(s) correspond(s) to the subject of the main question
2. Every relationship corresponds to a subquestion
- Check the consistency between research questions and the conceptual model
o Dependent variable(s): subject main Q
o In principle, every box occurs as a subquestion
o Every relationship occurs as a subquestion
- If not, then either change the conceptual model or change the questions


CAUSALITY
- X causes Y
o If we change X -> Y will change too
o X = cause, independent variable, predictor
o Y = effect, dependent, explained or predicted variable
- Why important?
o Understand – scientific
o Predict consequences of policy measures
- Condition for causality: X proceeds Y in time


Spurious relationship
- Two or more events or variables are associated but not causally related
- A correlation exists between X and Y
- This disappears after controlling for Z (3rd variable)
- Condition of causality: no 3rd variable exists that can explain away the correlation


Conditions for causality
1. Statistical correlation – can be measured
2. Cause before effect – time dependence can be a problem
3. No spurious relationship – measure all potential alternative causes and test if correlation
still exists
4. Theory: causal mechanism – how does the cause generate the effect

, RESEARCH DESIGN


Two important ideal types
- Experiment
o Typically – 1 group gets treatment, another group does not
o Much control by researchers – best design for ruling out alternative explanations –
statistical analysis is often simple
o Used for measuring effects of treatment and evaluative research (testing a
hypothesis)
o Main characteristics:
 Control on independent variables – researcher decides which case gets
treatment; time order control
 Randomization – cases are randomly assigned to control group and
experimental group
 the design allows finding the effect of X, taking into account
autonomous change
o effect due to cause (experimental group) = Y2 – Y1
o autonomous change (control group) = Y4 – Y3
 net effect = (Y2-Y1) – (Y4-Y3)
 Before and after measurement – how much has changed
 Control group – group that does not get treatment
- Survey
o Typically – large group of respondents completes a questionnaire
o Less control by researcher – ruling out of alternative explanations needs to e done
by using advanced statistics
o Often used for explorative and descriptive research
o Main characteristics:
 Systematic interviewing or observation – all cases gets same questions
and same response possibilities
 One moment measurement – no before/after measurement; problems with
time control
 Large numbers – many cases to have reliable measurements; many
variables – testing for possible alternative causes (spurious relationship)
o When to apply? – predictors that can be controlled (age, gender etc.) // non-
observable variables (motives, attitudes, preferences, perceptions, wishes, needs
and plans / reasons for behaviour / behaviour in past)
o But problems with identification of causality
 No time control – due to 1 measurement moment & no control on
predictor // does cause come before effect? *theory necessary
 Spurious relations – in an experiment potential alternative explanations
are ruled out // this does not apply for a survey *explicitly test for spurious
correlations


VALIDITY
- Internal validity – are casual interpretations in research valid // are an alternative
explanation ruled
- External validity – are results generalizable to different places, times, groups and
circumstances

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tue2022. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

70840 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.57
  • (0)
  Add to cart