100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
JOMC 486 REVIEWED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS $14.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

JOMC 486 REVIEWED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

JOMC 486 REVIEWED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS What is the highest level of speech? - CORRECT ANSWER pure speech What is considered pure speech? - CORRECT ANSWER public speech, writing What is considered intermediate speech? - CORRECT ANSWER-symbolic, advertising, broadcasting What is consid...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 19  pages

  • July 20, 2024
  • 19
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
JOMC 486 REVIEWED QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS




What is the highest level of speech? - CORRECT ANSWER-
pure speech

What is considered pure speech? - CORRECT ANSWER-
public speech, writing

What is considered intermediate speech? - CORRECT
ANSWER-symbolic, advertising, broadcasting

What is considered "unprotected" speech - CORRECT
ANSWER-fighting words, libel, obscenity, threats, fraud

What are the levels of scrutiny? - CORRECT ANSWER-strict,
intermediate, rational

What level of scrutiny is used w/ content-based speech? -
CORRECT ANSWER-strict

What level of scrutiny is used w/ content-neutral speech? -
CORRECT ANSWER-intermediate

Content Based - CORRECT ANSWER-restrictions on the
subject matter or the ideas expressed in the regulated speech

content neutral - CORRECT ANSWER-time, place, and manner
restrictions

,T/F: protection for newsgathering is strong - CORRECT
ANSWER-false. it is weak. "most hostile of the three
dichotomies"

Brandenburg v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Gov't can't punish
or prohibit inflammatory speech unless it is likely to incite
imminent lawless action.

Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act - CORRECT ANSWER-Used to
restrict speech made by socialists, radicalists, labor unions

Brandenburg Test - CORRECT ANSWER-Speech can be
restricted based on three factors:
- Imminence
- Likely to incite
- intent to incite imminent lawless action
Lead to clear and imminent danger test

Speech Action Dichotomy - CORRECT ANSWER-
Differentiation between speech and action and what is
protected.
1) pure speech is wholly protected
2) Actions undertaken for expressive purposes may be
regulated, but still receive some protection
3) non-expressive actions have no 1st amendment protection

What type of scrutiny was used in Brandenburg ? - CORRECT
ANSWER-strict. facial challenge to a statute

US vs. O'Brien - CORRECT ANSWER-Burning a draft card is
not protected by free speech.

O'Brien Test - CORRECT ANSWER-a four-part test used to
determine whether a content-neutral law is constitutional
1) is reg. within the constitutional power of the government?
2) Does it further substantial gov. interest?

, 3) gov. interest unrelated to the suppression of expression?
4) is any incidental restriction on 1st amend. freedoms no
greater than necessary for furthering the gov. interest?

When should the O'Brien test be used? - CORRECT ANSWER-
To determine when state interest in regulating conduct is
sufficient to justify some limitations on expression

Texas v. Johnson - CORRECT ANSWER-A 1989 case in which
the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of
the American flag on the grounds that such action was
symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.

What was the concurring opinion of Justice Kennedy in Texas
v. Johnson? - CORRECT ANSWER-didn't like allowing flag
burning as a form of free speech....but constitution demands as
much room as possible for freedom of expression

Fighting Words - CORRECT ANSWER-words that by their very
nature inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the
peace

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul - CORRECT ANSWER-In this 1986
case, the Supreme Court struck down a hate crimes law that
prohibited cross burning.

Anger, alarm and resentment: fighting words? - CORRECT
ANSWER-too broad, not what fighting words doctrine covers

Fighting Words Doctrine - CORRECT ANSWER-the idea that
censorship can be justified against inciting provocation to
violence
- applies to primarily (if not only) face-to-face situations
- injury must be more than emotional
- regulation MUST BE content neutral!!!!

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TIFFACADEMICS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $14.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81311 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$14.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart