Summary
OCR AS Psychology Piliavin summary sheet
- Course
- Institution
Summary sheet for core study describing the basics for the study as well as ethical consideration and evaluations of validity and reliability within the study.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
lilywilkinson2007
Content preview
Background Aim: To test bystander behaviour in ReliabilityKitty Genovese was murdered and no one came to a real life setting (type, race of High in control as they did it at the same time and in a set
help. victim, group size and modelling). period of time between April and June.
Theory of bystander behaviour Lacks reliability as it was a field experiment so low levels
Bystander apathy = what people do. Method of control.
Diffusion of Responsibility Field experiment using High in inter-rater reliability as there were 2 experiments
Pluralistic ignorance = reject norm privately. observational techniques. overserving helping behaviours on subway.
Cost benefit = benefit for individual. Independent measures design. Lacks internal reliability as it was a field experiment and
Attribution = explain cause of behaviour. Snapshot study therefore, harder to control for extraneous variables.
Altruistic behaviour = opposite of selfishness. Quantitative and qualitative data. High in internal reliability as females were always assigned
IV’s = Type of victim = drunk/cane role of observer but males were always model or victim.
Sample Race of victim = black/white
Opportunity sampling with estimated 4450 travellers Modelling/ no model Validity
on New York subway (45% black and 55% white) DV = Number of people who helped High in population validity as it as there was a large
Average per carriage = 43. and time taken to help. sample of 4450 travellers.
Sub-DV = Gender, race, location Low in population validity as all travellers on the sub-way
Procedure
were in New York.
-16 researchers in teams of 4 (2m/2f) and males Piliavin et al. High in ecological validity as it was a field experiment and,
were model or victim and females were observers.
Findings – Type of victim in the travellers, natural environment of sub-way in New
-103 trials between 1am – 3pm from April 15-26
-Cane victim = 95% helped. York.
June 1986. Used trains between 59th and 125th
-Drunk victim = 50% helped. Can be argued as not ecologically valid as it is probably a
street.
-60% of victims had 2 or more rare occurrence that someone would collapse on a
-Boarded train using different doors and the critical
helpers. subway.
area was varied locations.
-34 people left critical area when Ethics
-Female observers sat outside critical area.
collapsed in drunk condition. Confidentiality was kept as all ppts anonymous as they
-Male model stood and victim stood next to pole.
-Quicker to help in cane than drunk. didn’t know who was helping victim as they were on a
-In critical and adjacent area, model either went
Findings- Race of Victim sub-way with people getting on and off all the time.
early (after 70s) or late (after 150s).
-Black victim = less help and slower. No informed consent a the ppts didn’t know they were
Conclusions -Same race helping occurred. taking part.
-Drunk were less likely to get help than cane. -Males more helpful than females. Participants were deceived as they didn’t know they were
-Men were more likely to help male victim. Findings – Model/Passengers taking part in the study and didn’t know what the study
-No diffusion of responsibility was found. -Early model has more affect. was about.
-Same race helping occurred more with drunk. -People helped before model. May have been caused distress if they saw the victim in
-Contradicts Latane and Darley. -More passenger in CA = more help. pain or didn’t help the victim as they may have felt guilty
-No difusion of responsibility. afterwards.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lilywilkinson2007. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.73. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now