Exam (elaborations)
WGU D002 TEST LATEST UPDATE
- Course
- Institution
WGU D002 TEST LATEST UPDATE...
[Show more]
Content preview
WGU D002 TEST LATEST UPDATE Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) - ANSWER: Separate educational facilities were unequal Hobsen v. Hansen (1967) - ANSWER IDEA Part B nondiscriminatory assessment Diana v. California State Board of Education (1970) - ANSWER: Students must be evaluated in their primary language ANSWER: The state was unable to ascertain uneducability in PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1972). Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia (1972) - ANSWER: In the event that there are insufficient funds, all programs should be proport ionally reduced to ensure that exceptional students receive an education, as outlined in section 504. Larry P. v. Riles (1979) - ANSWER IQ tests could not serve as the primary rationale for enrolling students in special programs. 1982 Board of Education Henrick Hudson School System v Rowley - ANSWER: Schools are not obligated to provide services that are superior; rather, they are required to provide services that are equal and appropriate, FAPE Irving Independent School District v Tatro 1984 - ANSWER medical procedures were a necessary service for students with physical disabilities ANSWER: In the case of Honig v. Doe (1988), it was determined that children with emotional or physical disabilities could not be excluded from schoo l for misconduct if their behavior was a manifestation of their disability. The conceptual comprehension of the "least restrictive environment" was fur ther solidified in the case of Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education 1989. Forest Grove School District vs TA 2009; Florence County School District Four v Shannon Carter 1993 - ANSWER: When public schools are unable to provide a free, appropriate education, parents are compelled to enroll their children in pri vateThe benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller luzlinkuz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.69. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
81531 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now