100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Offer and Acceptance $3.81
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Offer and Acceptance

 0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

The first stage of creating a contract - offer and acceptance, is considered.

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • Unknown
  • September 27, 2019
  • 4
  • 2017/2018
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Chapter 3
Notes:

Offer and Acceptance
1. An offer is a statement by one party of a willingness to enter into a contract on stated
terms, provided that these terms are accepted by the party to whom the offer is addressed
 As Prof. Atiyah suggested either the court adopts “reasoning forward” i.e.
the traditional approach of offer and acceptance or “reasoning backward” i.e.
the court will enforce the contract and then look for offer and acceptance from
the conduct of parties.
2. An offer must be distinguished from an invitation to treat.
 Distinction between offer and invitation = INTENTION
 Invitation to treat = expression of willingness to enter into
negotiations which may lead to conclusion of contract (part of continuing
negotiation process – NOT bound)
 Offer = bound by acceptance of terms w/o further negotiation
E.g. Gibson v Man City Council [1978]
 Controlled by conservatives – scheme of ‘right to buy’ council flats (selling council flats)
 Gibson submits saying he wants to buy his house so completed form but left purchase price blank
because he wanted to know whether the council would repair the path to his house or whether he
could deduct the costs from the property
 May 1971 political control changes to Labour
 Labour = against idea of ‘right to buy’ therefore abolish scheme
 Council refused to sell house - claimed no contract had been concluded
 Gibson had to prove he had a contract with council before May 1971 – in order to establish a
binding contract Gibson had to point to a document which contained the offer
 CA held that contract HAD been concluded – Lord Denning argued that there was agreement
between the parties on all material points
 Decision was reversed by HofL
 Diplock argued that the words ‘may be prepared to sell’ did not amount to an actual offer as it didn’t
express a willingness to be bound BUT did express a willingness to enter into
negotiations (Invitation to treat) – Gibson was ‘invited’ to make a formal application
 Gibson shows that it is not easy to ascertain when negotiations end and an
offer is made – court tried to ascertain intention of parties
Display of Goods e.g. Pharmaceutical Society v Boots Cash Chemist [1953]
 Boots organised shop on self service basis – was in breach of s18 of Pharmacy and
Poisons Act 1933
 Required sale of drugs take place under supervision of registered pharmacist
 Change in shopping system meant that people could buy medication without pharmacist
 No pharmacist present a shelves but there was one at the cashier - were authorised to
stop customer buying drugs if thought was fit to do so
 Was held that the display of goods was simply an invitation to treat and therefore
there had been no breach of act and that the sale took place at cash desk NOT at removal
from shelves
E.g. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Company [1893] – advertisement = offer
3. An acceptance is an unqualified expression of assent to the terms proposed by the
offeror. An acceptance must generally be communicated to the offeror
 Acceptance can be made by conduct e.g. Carlill – does not have to be made
by words
 Conduct will only amount to acceptance if it is clear that the offeree did act
with the intention (objectively assessed) of accepting the offer
4. A purpoted acceptance which does not mirror the terms of the offer (and introduces new
terms) is NOT an acceptance but a counter offer which kills off the original offer
E.g. Hyde v Wrench [1840]
5. An offer cannot be accepted by someone who is ignorant of the existing offer or by
someone who does not have the offer in his mind when he acts which he alleges constitutes
acceptance
 Offer is only effective when it has been communicated to offeree

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller topqualitynotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.81. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64450 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$3.81
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added