Aim of the study
• To see whether racial composition of a jury, and the role of the defendents, has an
effect on decision-making
Procedure of the study
• Used secondary data from different study of juries
• This earlier study in 2002 analysed trials in 4 US states.
• Only done on black defendents
• IV - race of jury, measured in terms of % of white, black and Hispanic jurors
• DV - whether or not trial led to conviction
Results of the study
• Juries of a higher % of white jurors were more likely to convict black defendents
• Juries of higher % of black jurors were less likely to convict black defendents
Conclusions of the study
• Racial composition of a jury has significant effect on likelihood of conviction
• Black defendents more likely to be convicted by a mostly white/Hispanic jury than a
black jury
Strengths of the study
• High external validity - data from real juries analysed. Researchers used secondary
data from real juries trials. Avoided demand characteristics
Weaknesses of the study
• - Low generalisability - all defendents were black, may not represent the experience
of defendents from other racial groups
• - Low validity - other characteristics aside from race were not controlled. Unlikely
that jurors based their judgements on race alone
, Cognitive/ethical interviews
Describe cognitive interviews
• The aim is to help witness produce more accurate recall of a crime scene. Includes 4
techniques:
• Report everything
• Reinstate the context
• Reverse the order
• Change perspective
Describe ethical interviews
• Method of interviewing that acknowledges that suspects are more likely to
cooperate with police if rapport is established and treated respectfully.
• Used for more sensitive crimes - rape, murder
• Aims to teach police to keep a more open mind and behave less aggressively
towards suspects
Describe PEACE model
• Based on the idea that suspects are more likely to cooperate with police and give
true confessions if they feel releaxed. Includes:
• Preparation and planning
• Engage and explain
• Account
• Closure
• Evaluate
Strengths of CI/EI interviews
• Geiselman et al - showed ppts violent film then asked to recall using traditional
questions vs CI. Found higher accuracy when using CI
• More ethical procedure for using interviews and better justice system
• Christianson and Holmberg - Found that interviews marked by respect and positive
attitude were most linked with confessions
Weaknesses of CI/EI
• Kohnken - CI produces lots of inaccuracies, but more information
• Gudjonsson - argues that some EI techniques are naive.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nehan2. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.92. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.