100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Duress Evaluation Plan $4.60   Add to cart

Essay

Duress Evaluation Plan

 12 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

An in-depth evaluation of the law on duress. The plan provides a balanced argument and is of an A* standard.

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • July 28, 2024
  • 4
  • 2023/2024
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+
avatar-seller
Duress Evaluation

Imminent

 The case of Hussain, where the Ds hijacked a plane to escape religious persecution,
established that a threat need not be ‘immediate’ but must be ‘imminent’ in the
sense that it is hanging over the defendant.
 Arguably, this lacks clarity, and suggests a new definition is needed.
 However, this blanket term can be moulded to fit each individual case, suggesting
that this ambiguity is needed.

Not Available for Murder

Moral

 The law on duress is arguably too harsh. This is reflected by the fact that the defence
is not available for murder, as confirmed in R v Howe, which overruled the DPP v
Lynch.
 Lord Hailsham thought that the ordinary person should be capable of heroism if she
is asked to take an innocent life rather than sacrifice her own. This is even in cases
where a mother is being asked to sacrifice her children.
 Lynch stated that the law would be inhumane if it did not recognise the ‘powerful
and natural’ instinct for self-preservation.
 Therefore, the fact that the law now contradicts Lynch can be deemed problematic.

Far Removed

 The overruling of Lynch also means duress is no longer a defence for a secondary
party on a charge of murder.
 A problem with this is that a defendant can be guilty of murder even if their
involvement was far removed from the actual killing. For example, if they were
simply a getaway driver.
 From this, it is suggested that the law is too harsh and needs to be reversed in order
to align, once again, with the principles set out in Lynch.

Age

 The age and/or susceptibility of a defendant to duress are also ignored as shown by
the case of R v Wilson (2007). The Court of Appeal in that case accepted that there
might be grounds for criticising the rule that did not allow a 13-year-old boy any
defence to a charge of murder, even though he was only doing what his father told
him when he was too frightened to refuse to obey.

Crimes with Similar MR

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller eleanortrend. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.60. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

80461 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.60
  • (0)
  Add to cart