College aantekeningen
Laws2018 Leases ; Full lecture notes
- Vak
- Instelling
This is a comprehensive and detailed note on exclusive possession; leases for Land Law. Essential! To your success in Southampton!!
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
Voorbeeld 2 van de 7 pagina's
In winkelwagen
In winkelwagen
Verkoper
Volgen
anyiamgeorge19
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
[2A] Ex clusive P ossession1.Lease or license?
2.Lease? = S v M – 3 Indicia Test of ex clusive possession:
To grant a lease y ou need to giv e them ex clusive possession of the land. Diff erent t o exclusiv e occupation. Stree t v Mountf ord- The three essen tial indicia of a t enancy are:
(1)A gra nt of ex clusive possession – rig ht to e xclude the landlord a nd everybody else
from the pr operty . -> Multiple occupatio n, can they int roduce a new per son? Is it a sham/pret ence- Int ention?
(2)For a t erm- period of time f or which you hold the land – need f or certainty
(3)At a rent – not strictly neces sary but most charg e payment f or the use of land
-If ha ve all 3 – you then ha ve a lease. Most import ant is no.1 Stree t v mountf ord- one landlor d, one occupier (in Bournemouth) – arrangements made and husband to live with her but h e wasn’t ar ound when contr act made – so in her name as self -cont ained accommoda tion. Stree t gave her a document ca lled license agree ment, specifying she cou ld occupy the room, in common with someone els e nominated by the landlord. (a t this time, subject to rent Act - as long as you paid ren t, you c ould sta y as long as you wan ted) T erm at the botto m of the agreemen t, called Coda - signed recognis ing she did not hav e
rent act security . Qu, whether this constitut ed a tenancy or licenc e. Ct of Appeal- landlord had t o intend t o create a leas e. – but Supreme Ct - inten tion was determ ined objectively by the t erms of the arr angement – name of doc was not conclusive & t he HoL reject ed term giving the landlor d the right t o intr oduce someone else as its not what the parties intend ed. “ sham agreemen t” “a pretence”
Multiple occupiers:
Antoniades v Villers – unmarried coup le took a flat , both signed separ ate license agreem ents – agr eed to shar e with each other but if one of them left, the landlord cou ld intr oduce a ra ndom third per son. Also , while they w ere a coupl e, the landlord cou ld intr oduce a thir d person or occupy h imself . Precedent in this comes fr om Somma v Haz elhur st. – unmarried couple in a single bedsit r oom. – had the landlord done so , it would br each the fir e regulatio ns. CoA- allow ed the licenses in Somma v Haz elhurst. Do they r everse this or no t? As in A v V , three people could liv e in the flat. HoL r ever ed somma v Hazelhur st – the y wer e tenan ts, LL couldn’t intr oduce anyone els e. – intr oduced terminology of pr esence
when rejecting the thir d person. AG securities v V aughan – 4 roomed fla t, landlord gr anted the use of r ooms separa tely. All mov ed in at diff erent times and paid diff erent r ents. Fr ee to lea ve individually . HoL, rev ersed Co A decision, these people w ere licensees a nd not tenan ts. A, had to share with B , C &D- no ex clusive occupa tion. One room which was best – every one else mov ed round the fla t if one left. Sharing occupa tion. Split Ren ts:
Mikeover v Br ady- Occupier s paid unequal rent. Held by CoA - to pa y unequal ren ts mean they ar e licensees and not tenan ts. Sub-license agreemen ts:
Bruton v London Quadr ant Inv . - property wh ich was short lif e property - scheduled for demolition and rebuild ing. London council wan ted to use it until it wa s rede veloped. Gr ant a license t o a housing charity – to be used a s a hoste l for homeless men. One such homeless man w as Bruton – given e xclusiv e use of a ro om, but every time it r ained, wat er came in thr ough the ro of- conditions wer e not habitable. If B had a lease, the L L would ha ve to r epair, where a s if it was a license- no repairing and t ermination. Lease or li cense? Millett said in this chance, London quadr ant don’t ha ve exclusive possession – don’t ha ve the right to e xclude the owner - no EP , means they can’t gr ant EP to an yone else (Maj ac ademic view). Lor d Hoffman said- if the sub-LL, reports t o gra nt EP to an occupi er it crea tes a lease between them. Using a principle of Est opple. No valid lease ag ainst owner of land. [2B] Leasehold Est ates
Distinguishing fr eeholds and leaseholds:
Defined in LP A 1925 s.1(1)
Term of y ears ab solute Lease can be cut short - e.g. if you don’t pay r ent. When the lease is over , it reverses back to being a fr eehold. Commencement:
LPA 1925 s.149(3)- a lease is void, if it purports t o gra nt possession, mor e than 21 year s aft er the gr ant of the lease- r eversion r elease. –can gr ant future leases , with a max of 21 yr s. Swift v Macbean – From the outbrea k of war , until the t ermination of the w ar. – granted during thes e periods. Lease was v alid. T erminatio n – overruled ca se. W eak authority f or a lease. – an y lease must be r egistered. So the ga p between t odays date and the da y the person move s in cannot be longe r than 21 year s, otherwise inv alid.
Perpe tual renew al:
LPA 1922 s.190 – conv erts it int o a lease f or 2000 year s- fixed the r ent f or 2000 into the future, pr obably by mis take. Parkus v Gr eenwood – Exampl e – L to T f or 3 year s, with an option to rene w on same terms, includ ing this covenant f or renew al. This proc ess can go on f orever , as long as you k eep renewing the lease. Maximum dur ation fixed :
Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:
Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews
Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!
In een paar klikken geregeld
Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.
Direct to-the-point
Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper anyiamgeorge19. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor $11.99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 65040 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen
Laatst bekeken door jou
Samenvatting ·
Philosophy of Science exam summary
Overig ·
Uitwerkingen Weektaak 3 OIMA
Case uitwerking ·
NR 508 Week 2 Case Study Discussion
Samenvatting ·
Digital organisation summary
College aantekeningen ·
Psychology of Advertising (cijfer 10)
Voordeelbundel ·
Seminarios Economía Laboral
Samenvatting ·
Unit 13: Photosynthesis Notes
Samenvatting ·
Week 4 Personality Disorders
