Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
CNST Law and Ethics Pt. 2 from Cases and handouts || with 100% Error-free Answers. $10.69   Ajouter au panier

Examen

CNST Law and Ethics Pt. 2 from Cases and handouts || with 100% Error-free Answers.

 7 vues  0 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • CNST Law and Ethics
  • Établissement
  • CNST Law And Ethics

was Zachary Construction the petitioner or respondent? correct answers Petitioner was Port of Houston the petitioner or respondent? correct answers Respondent The common law permits a contractor to recover damages for construction delays caused by the owner, but the parties are free to corr...

[Montrer plus]

Aperçu 2 sur 6  pages

  • 4 août 2024
  • 6
  • 2024/2025
  • Examen
  • Questions et réponses
  • CNST Law and Ethics
  • CNST Law and Ethics
avatar-seller
FullyFocus
CNST Law and Ethics Pt. 2 from Cases and handouts || with
100% Error-free Answers.
was Zachary Construction the petitioner or respondent? correct answers Petitioner

was Port of Houston the petitioner or respondent? correct answers Respondent

The common law permits a contractor to recover
damages for construction delays caused by the owner, but the
parties are free to correct answers contract differently

how long was the dock supposed to be in Zachary v. Port of Houston originally? correct answers
1,660 ft, two ships in 5 sections 40 ft deep

how much was the original cost of the wharf? correct answers $62,485,733

"the port authority shall ____ have the rig to control the manner" of building correct answers not

what type of conditions did zachary want to work in? correct answers in-the-dry

how long did zachary have to complete the 2 sections for the chinese ship? correct answers 20
months

what were the liquidated damages for being late to deliver the 2 sections for the chinese ship?
correct answers $20,000 a day

what concerns did the port have with zacharys plan for the change order? correct answers they
were concerned that freezing the ground
near the piers might destabilize them, weakening the wharf
and making it unsafe.

the jury found in favor of: correct answers zachary

Texas supreme court found in favor of: correct answers Port of Houston

Zachary had to pay above all else _____ correct answers damages (rust) on defective fenders for
$970,000

was MASTEC the petitioner or respondent? correct answers Respondent

was El Paso the petitioner or respondent? correct answers Petitioner

what is the case over regarding MASTEC and El Paso? correct answers breach of contract by the
owner in not following through due diligence locating foreign crossings

, In MASTEC v. El Paso, Texas supreme court found in favor of: correct answers El Paso, Mastec
had the responsibility of confirming the foreign crossings

the end result of MASTEC v. El Paso, Texas correct answers The court found that the contract
allocated all risk to the contractor for unknown
obstacles discovered during the construction process.
Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals'
judgment and reinstate the trial court's judgment

What was El Paso's project? correct answers a 68 mile 8" pipeline for petroleum, the line was too
shallow and needed to be deeper, replace line with new one for butane

Mastec was trying to branch out into a new field of work correct answers bid significantly lower
than all other bidders by about 4 million

foreign crossings correct answers other pipelines, utilities, roads,
rivers, canals, fences, wells, cables, and concrete
structures

undiscovered foreign crossings were ____ correct answers within the scope of work

Mastec filed ____ over the 794 unknown crossings correct answers fraud

What is the case between Pearson and Fullingim (awesome air) over? correct answers breach of
contract since the pearsons signed contract, but had another team do work

the note Mrs. Pearson was correct answers a contract

Mr. and Mrs. Pearson were in the process of divorce and ____ the jury trial correct answers
missed

Mr. Pearson was ____ about the trial, and _____ correct answers negligent in reading the details,
the trial decision remained, so he had to appeal

Mrs. Pearson's suit was ______ correct answers dismissed by awesome air

Mr. Pearson Appealed: correct answers he did not receive notice of the
trial setting, the petition does not support the judgment, and the evidence is factually insufficient
to support the
award

Awesome Air's document was a contract because: correct answers it was clearly stated, just not
on the first page

Awesome Air reserved the right to: correct answers begin work before obtaining pre-payment

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur FullyFocus. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour $10.69. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

71498 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
$10.69
  • (0)
  Ajouter