100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Questions and Answers Session I: Clinical Trials and Beyond $16.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Questions and Answers Session I: Clinical Trials and Beyond

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Clinical Trials and Beyond
  • Institution
  • Clinical Trials And Beyond

QUESTIONS FOR DR. ANDREWS From Dr. John Bowyer What is known about CNTF expression when electrical stimulation is applied to regenerating motor neurons? ANSWER: Obviously an important issue—and one for which, to my knowledge, there are few data at present. Although I have not searched t...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • August 4, 2024
  • 6
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Clinical Trials and Beyond
  • Clinical Trials and Beyond
avatar-seller
StudyCenter1
Questions and Answers
Session I: Clinical Trials and Beyond

QUESTIONS FOR DR. ANDREWS

From Dr. John Bowyer
What is known about CNTF expression when electrical stimulation is applied to
regenerating motor neurons?
ANSWER: Obviously an important issue—and one for which, to my knowledge, there
are few data at present. Although I have not searched the ciliary neurotrophic factor
(CNTF) literature exhaustively, there do not appear to be any studies similar to those
noted in the neuromodulation applications paper by Al-Majed et al. on BDNF and
electrical stimulation in peripheral nerve regeneration. Because CNTF appears to
stimulate axonal regeneration (W.V. McCallister, P. Tang, J. Smith, et al. 2001. J.
Hand Surg. [Am.] 26(3): 478–488), a replication of Al-Majed’s work assessing
CNTF in addition to BDNF under electrical stimulation could be productive—as also
could be considering the effects of injection of BDNF and CNTF on axonal regener-
ation (M. Watanabe & Y. Fukuda. 2002. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 21(6): 529–553).
What is known about DBS and VNS in animal models with respect to long-term
biochemical changes and synaptic?
ANSWER: Not nearly enough. To secure FDA approval for clinical use, safety and
efficacy are the primary considerations. Histologic studies (in both animals and
humans) have not shown significant permanent injury to the brain (or vagus nerve in
the case of VNS) from chronic electrical stimulation. The rapid return to prestimu-
lation clinical status on turning the stimulator off (DBS or VNS) also argues for little,
if any, permanent or irreversible biochemical or physiologic changes. A recent
review on VNS has appeared since the Hilton Head ICNA meeting (T.R. Henry.
2002. Neurology 59(Suppl. 4): S3–S14).
What is known about repetitive TMS and increased risk of brain tumors?
ANSWER: To my knowledge, very little. Given the brevity of even repetitive TMS—
in comparison with, for example, MRI scanning—one might expect the risk for brain
tumor development to be low. It will certainly become an issue if TMS shows prom-
ise for “standard of care” treatment, such as for intractable epilepsy, where periodic
TMS treatments might be necessary.

From Dr. Merle Paule
How was the efficacy of VNS discovered?
ANSWER: Although the use of VNS to control seizures was first proposed and
demonstrated by Zabara (J. Zabara. 1985. Clin. Neurophysiol. 61: 162), perhaps the
first evidence, presented 65 years ago, was that vagus nerve stimulation can produce

Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 993: 48–53 (2003). ©2003 New York Academy of Sciences.

, SESSION I: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 49


EEG desynchronization in cats (P. Bailey & F. Bremer. 1938. J. Neurophysiol. 1:
405–412).
So, VNS is used primarily in persons with intractable seizures (not contracted by
drugs)?
ANSWER: Yes, or for individuals who are adversely affected (usually sedation) by
anticonvulsant medications.
Is VNS better (more effective) for one seizure type than for others, for example,
petit versus grand mal?
ANSWER: That is one of the difficulties of selecting intractable epilepsy patients for
VNS—it works moderately well in most seizure types. It is difficult to predict who
will gain little or no benefit. The initial studies for FDA approval concentrated on
refractory complex partial epilepsy, but the benefit for patients with refractory gen-
eralized tonic–clonic epilepsy appears to be similar. There are some patients, such
as those previously candidates for corpus callosotomy (or who have had corpus cal-
losotomy), who appear to benefit especially well from VNS.
Given that VNS is continuous for treatment of epilepsy, what are the adverse
effects (for months/years)?
ANSWER: The primary complaints—tickle in the throat, cough, voice change—
diminish rapidly over the first few weeks to months of VNS stimulation. There do
not appear to be long-term adverse effects—just as there do not appear to be long-
term adverse effects from deep brain stimulation or spinal cord stimulation.
It is my understanding that TMS involves very large magnetic fields. Do you
think the very (by comparison) weak magnets sold to be worn (on wrist; Velcro to
the back of the spine, etc.) are potent or strong enough to actually have biological
effects?
ANSWER: I am not familiar with the “hard science” literature on such weak magnet
devices. Like many complementary or alternative (herbal) medications, there is
likely a combination of physiologic efficacy and psychologic belief in the therapy.
Certainly electromagnetic fields (even those emitted by small electrical appliances—
such as cell phones) are suspected of having significant biological effects—at close
range (cm), since the field strength drops off as a square of the distance from the
source.

From Dr. Aiden Doyle
What about failure of placebo-controlled trial in depression VNS study versus
placebo?
ANSWER: Yes—the verdict is not yet in on the efficacy of VNS for mood disorders.
Certainly much can be done with various methods of stimulation (i.e., rate, fre-
quency, etc.). Probably more promise is seen in deep brain stimulation for mood dis-
orders—which is compounded further by the various regions in the brain that
theoretically would be effective targets for stimulation.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudyCenter1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $16.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$16.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart