100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
BLAW Test 2 - Chapter 16 - Written Contracts Questions and Answers $7.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

BLAW Test 2 - Chapter 16 - Written Contracts Questions and Answers

 9 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • BLAW
  • Institution
  • BLAW

BLAW Test 2 - Chapter 16 - Written Contracts Questions and Answers

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • August 5, 2024
  • 7
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • BLAW
  • BLAW
avatar-seller
Hkane
BLAW Test 2 - Chapter 16 - Written Contracts
a. an integration clause - ✔✔Vicki entered into a written contract to buy a car from Valley Motors.
The written contract included a provision that stated, "This writing is the full and final expression of the
parties' agreement; anything said before signing or while signing is irrelevant." This is:
a. an integration clause.
b. a statute of frauds clause.
c. parol evidence
d. an exculpatory clause

a. can enforce the contract against Amy because the statute of frauds is satisfied under this situation.
- ✔✔Amy Hudson has been trying to purchase Glen Cappel's antique desk for some time, but Glen
has been reluctant to sell. One evening Glen said to Amy, "Okay, I'll sell the desk for $550." Amy
replied, "Thank you, Glen. I accept." The agreement was not reduced to writing, but Glen and Amy
did shake hands. Two days later, Amy sent Glen a letter outlining the terms of the agreement, and
stating that she would deliver $550 cash according to the agreement within ten days. The letter was
signed, "Best regards, Amy." Later, Amy had second thoughts, and refused to go through with the
purchase. Nothing had been exchanged at this point. Glen:
a. can enforce the contract against Amy because the statute of frauds is satisfied under this situation.
b. cannot enforce the contract against Amy because her signature was inadequate without her last
name under the statute of frauds.
%

c. cannot enforce the contract against Amy because he di

a. declares that a contract or signature may not be denied enforceability just because it is in
electronic form. - ✔✔The Uniform Electronic Transmission Act (UETA):
a. declares that a contract or signature may not be denied enforceability just because it is in
electronic form.
b. was passed by Congress in 2002.
c. creates a safe cyberspace environment in which business communications cannot be intercepted
or fraudulently altered.
d. all of the above

a. No. The parol evidence rule will most likely exclude any evidence of the discussion of the warranty.
- ✔✔Vicki entered into a written contract to buy a car from Valley Motors. During the negotiations, the
sales representative said that the car had a two-year full warranty. The written contract included a
provision that stated, "This writing is the full and final expression of the parties' agreement; anything
said before signing or while signing is irrelevant." The written contract did not include a warranty. Two
months after Vicki took delivery of the car, she discovered that the transmission needed to be
replaced. Vicki claimed that it was covered by the full warranty. Will Vicki be able to present evidence
as to the sales representative's statements concerning the warranty?

, a. No. The parol evidence rule will most likely exclude any evidence of the discussion of the warranty.
b. Yes. The leading object rule will allow evidence as to the discussion of the warranty.
c. Yes. The evidence is needed because the contract is

a. The contract has an integration clause in it and Scott's point of contention is covered in detail in the
contract, although not to his favor. - ✔✔Scott is trying to introduce oral evidence in court to alter the
terms of a written contract he had with Bonnie. Bonnie has raised the parol evidence rule as an
objection to Scott's testimony. In which of the following circumstances will Scott not be able to
introduce the oral evidence?
a. The contract has an integration clause in it and Scott's point of contention is covered in detail in the
contract, although not to his favor.
b. There was a mutual mistake of a material fact when the contract was entered into.
c. The oral evidence is introduced to clarify the meaning of an ambiguous term used in the written
contract.
d. Scott claims that he was defrauded into entering into the contract and wants to testify about the
intentional misrepresentations of material facts.

a. totally integrated contracts - ✔✔Which of the following types of contracts cannot be either
contradicted or supplemented by evidence of prior agreements or expressions?
a. totally integrated contracts
b. incomplete contracts
%

c. ambiguous contracts
d. oral contracts

b. be signed by the defendant and contain the name of each party, the subject matter of the
agreement, and the essential terms and promises. - ✔✔In order to satisfy the statute of frauds, a
writing must:
a. be a formal written document drafted by an attorney
b. be signed by the defendant and contain the name of each party, the subject matter of the
agreement, and the essential terms and promises.
c. be notarized
d. all of the above

b. Derek will win because the writing is sufficient under the statute of frauds. - ✔✔Derek and Abyan
were discussing business over lunch when they agreed on the sale of a five-acre parcel of land.
Since neither of them had any paper with them, Derek wrote the following on a napkin: "Abyan agrees
to purchase from Derek a 5-acre parcel located at the local address of 123 105th Street, St. Joseph,
Minnesota, U.S.A. for the price of $4,500 per acre. Transfer of title, payment, and possession to take
place on May 1, 2011." Abyan signed the napkin. On May 1, 2011, Derek was ready to close the deal

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Hkane. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73091 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart