100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Ecologism full notes $20.86
Add to cart

Summary

Summary Ecologism full notes

 13 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

all notes for the ecologism ideology - ALL YOU WILL NEED TO GET AN A*

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

  • August 6, 2024
  • 10
  • 2024/2025
  • Summary
avatar-seller
ECOLOGISM




CORE IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES
1. ECOLOGY
Anthropocentric: Humans behave anthropocentrically, treating the planet's finite resources as if they were unlimited
and destroying and polluting the ecosystem in a pursuit for economic growth.

Ecocentric: A nature based rather than a human-centred system of values. It therefore gives priority to ecological
balance over human wants and needs.
 Ecologists argue that all elements of the earth has inherent value that is more fundamental and also goes
beyond what our human value of it is.

Biodiversity: the belief that as many species of plants and animals must survive and flourish as possible to maintain
the richness of nature. This will bring health and stability to the broad eco-community.

Three strands of ecological thought:
1. Deep green ecology - assets that the environment is a complex holistic web of interrelations between the
organic and non-organic. The interconnectedness of our holistic ecosystem sustains life, and humans must
develop and Ecocentric vision respecting both organic and non-organic life to preserve bio-diversity.
2. Shallow green ecology - is an enlightened anthropocentric vision whereby humans acts as environmental
stewards to protect the planet.
3. Social ecology - argues that environmental degradation is linked to specific social constructs that must be
overturned before radical ecological change can occur. Aspects of social ecology are eco-socialism, eco-
anarchism and eco-feminist.

ECO VS EGO - humans are seen as part of a wider ecosystem. This isn't like other ideologies, its Ecocentric, not
egocentric.

Key differences
The difference between deep green and shallow green ecology is that in shallow green anthropocentric's ego thinks it
dominates the ecosystem, while dark green has an Ecocentric view and perceives humans as but an aspect of the
environment.
 Ideologically different
 Deep green - do less, with less
 Shallow green - do more, with less
 Reduce, reuse, recycle - most important word for deep green is reduce - just use less, don't care if the
economy crashes
 Just stop oil and extinction rebellion - deep green
 Having kids, going on holiday

,  NHS - culturally accepted and expected, not true in the US - this shows that the difference between cultural
collective projects can be very different
 Many deep greens argue that shallow greens are even worse than normal people - go big or go home or
because shallow greens get their guilt relieved, but this shouldn't happen because they still mess up the
environment, but don't have enough motivation to go even further. They are the problem.

Green washing: shell sponsoring the cycling, to make them look like environmentalists.

Aldo Leopold
 Holistic thinker
 Ecology is the study of a 'world of wounds' such is the extent of environmental damage
 His ideas help him form this ideology
 The human race 'hammered the artefacts called civilisation'
 The land ethic - humans should accept that the land does not belong to them. There should be biocentric
equality where all beings and the community have equal value. Biodiversity is therefore essential to conserve
endangered species and their habitats. 'wilderness' landscapes free from human interference must be
preserved in their natural state - Ecocentric.
 Shallow green example counter point - south downs national park (youngest national park) - south downs
way. Its being protected, but part of the protection is egocentric, anthropocentric and for human enjoyment.
 Environmentally friendly business is still capitalist and anthropocentric, not deep green ideology.
 Aldo Leopold - deep green
 Deep green areas: blue range and Gila wildernesses in New Mexico, but you can now mine in them - deep
green hasn't worked.
 Controversial idea - more radical than an anarchic-communist (anthropocentric), as its also shared among all
living things and the land itself
 Conservation fails becasue it is based on an economic model where land is valued merely as a commodity of
monetary worth. Human nature must alter so it recognises that nature is no longer perceived as a resource
to be exploited.

2. HOLISM
Holism: every aspect of nature as being interconnected. The whole is therefore greater than the sum of its parts and
the environment self-regulates beyond human understanding.
 Holism actively argues for biological diversity and bio spherical egalitarianism, as a wide variety of species of
both flora and fauna is needed to preserve the ecosystem.

Bio spherical egalitarianism: Buddhist monks and Jains sweep in front of them before they walk to not kill bugs -
minimal impact on the world around them.

Rationalistic enlightenment thinkers disputed the idea of holism in 2 key ways:
1. Mechanisation world view - nature could be reduced to its constituent parts then examined in isolation as if
they were a machine. Deep green.
2. Dominion over nature - if nature is understood, it can be dominated by man, Francis Bacon, the
enlightenment thinker, concluded. Comes from the bible - we were made in the image of him, so the world is
there for us.
3. Shallow green stewardship - we do need to look after the earth.

If we cared less about material things, then we would focus more on values as a human being.

Carolyn Merchant views such a paradigm as destructive and hubristic. Likewise EF Schumacher argued that modern
living has facilitated this myth of human ascendancy as city dwellers are dislocated from the ecosystem, facilitating
the idea that humans are successfully dominating nature.
 Enlightenment thinks we have dominion over nature - but that is a hubristic view
 This exploitation in the long-term is hugely harmful to humans as well
 Humans are divorced from reality

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sophieallsop97. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $20.86. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$20.86
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added