QLD BAR EXAM PRACTICE SETS EXAM QUESTIONS AND REVISED CORRECT ANSWERS
19 views 0 purchase
Course
Qld Bar
Institution
Qld Bar
QLD BAR EXAM PRACTICE SETS
EXAM QUESTIONS AND REVISED
CORRECT ANSWERS
What is the exam looking for? - ANSWER : a) identify the
general principle behind the ethical/ bar rule and the reason for it;
b) answer the question asked and identify any legislative
provision or rule applicable;
...
QLD BAR EXAM PRACTICE SETS
EXAM QUESTIONS AND REVISED
CORRECT ANSWERS
What is the exam looking for? - ANSWER ✔ : a) identify the
general principle behind the ethical/ bar rule and the reason for it;
b) answer the question asked and identify any legislative
provision or rule applicable;
c) apply the content of the ethical/ Bar rule (or at least to state its
key components) in addition to stating the rule; and
d) identify where an active role in pursuing an ethical course is
required of the barrister whether that be vis a vis the solicitor, the
client, third party or the court.
Bale v Mills [2011] NSWCA 226 - ANSWER ✔ : Facts: After
hearing, leave was given to "add any references" to certain issues
concerning the application of Browne v Dunn to the proceedings.
Both parties provided further submissions, instead of merely
referring the court to additional authorities or other references.
Key principles:
· Parties should not place before the court any further material
after a hearing without, or outside of, any leave given.
· Once a matter is reserved, the parties' rights to argument and to
be heard have been exhausted: Bale v Mills.
Outcome: Court ignored further submissions provided.
Day v Perisher Blue Pty Ltd (2005) 62 NSWLR 731 - ANSWER
✔ : Proofs of evidence:
Case on lawyers who let witnesses communicate with each other
about there evidence on a group conference call.
,Rule:
Lawyers must take proofs of evidence from lay witnesses
separately and encourage them not to discuss their evidence with
others (in particular, with other potential witnesses).
Encouraging witnesses to confer / collude can amount to
unsatisfactory professional conduct or worse.
Ken Tugrul v Tarrants Financial Consultants Pty Ltd [No.2] [2013]
NSWSC 1971 - ANSWER ✔ : There should be no
communication (written or oral) with a judge's chambers in
connection with any proceedings without the knowledge and
consent of the other party other than in specific exceptional
cases:
(1) trivial matters of practice, procedure and administration;
(2) ex parte matters;
(3) responding to communication from court or where directed to
by court order / direction;
(4) exceptional circumstances.
AND:
· Sending an inappropriate communication with a disclosure of the
other party's lack of knowledge or consent does not cure any
impropriety.
Legal Services Commissioner v Mullins [2006] QLPT 12 -
ANSWER ✔ : Settlement negotiations anticipate a measure of
honesty from both parties.
Honesty extends outside of the courtroom
Cannot make a 'positive' claim on a dodgy claim
, Tri-star Petroleum Company & Ors v Australia Pacific LNG Pty
Limited & Ors [2017] QSC 136 - ANSWER ✔ : When express
undertakings as to disclosure of confidential information:
Default position there is a implied undertaking.
Sometimes an express is needed (by whom?)
• Party receiving compelled disclosure must not use it for an
unrelated purpose, unless it is received into evidence: Hearne v
Street. • Third parties also bound if aware of material's origins in
legal proceedings. • Implied undertaking usually enough to protect
confidentiality, but exceptional circumstances may require
express undertaking (e.g. trade rivals): Mobil Oil
Virgtel v Zabusky (No 2) [2009] 2 Qd R 293 - ANSWER ✔ :
Facts: After hearing, Counsel forwarded further submissions to
Court in circumstances where further submissions had not been
requested and leave not been sought.
Key principles: Parties must make their submissions at the
hearing afforded them by the Court. Further submissions may
only provided if court requests or leave granted.
Outcome: Court declined to receive further submissions.
Where are costs dealt with? - ANSWER ✔ : Part 3.4 LPA
ss 220, 227 and 246 LPA - ANSWER ✔ : Core LPA rules for
Bar:
· Bar Association may make rules: s 220, LPA.
· Rules are binding: s 227, LPA.
· Barristers cannot hold or receive trust money: s 246, LPA.
Scope of work of a barrister? - ANSWER ✔ : 2011 Barristers'
Rule: rr 15-19
Rule 15 (e.g. appearing as an advocate, negotiating for the client,
giving legal advice, settling documents).
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller NURSINGDICTIONARY. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.64. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
