100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LEV3701 Assignment 1 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 (150297)- DUE 21 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. $2.50   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LEV3701 Assignment 1 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 (150297)- DUE 21 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.

 48 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

LEV3701 Assignment 1 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 (150297)- DUE 21 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.

Preview 3 out of 22  pages

  • August 12, 2024
  • 22
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
LEV3701 Assignment
1 QUIZ (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2
2024 (150297)- DUE 21
August 2024 ; 100%
TRUSTED Complete,
trusted solutions and
explanations.




ADMIN
[COMPANY NAME]

,LEV3701 Assignment 1 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 (150297)- DUE 21 August 2024 ; 100%
TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Question 1 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 QUIZ
Consider the following statements about the compellability of
spouses to testify and choose the correct option: 1. Section 195
of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 has, to some extent,
been amended by section 68 of theCriminal Law (Sexual
Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007.
Subsection 195(1)(a) nowexcludes a child that is merely in the
care of the wife or the husband. 2. In terms of section 196 of the
Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, the spouse of an accused is
a competent as wellas a compellable witness in defence of that
accused, but only when such an accused is jointly charged
withsomeone else. 3. Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Act
51 of 1977 is applicable not only to people who are married
whentestifying is at stake, but also to people who were married
when the relevant crime was committed, even though
themarriage has been dissolved in the meantime. 4. If the
accused is jointly charged with someone else, the spouse of such
an accused will be competent andcompellable to give evidence
on behalf of that co-accused. Clear my choice UNISA  2024 
LEV3701-24-S2  Welcome Message  Assessment 1 Question
2 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 QUIZ A crowd of
people that are attending a rock concert are attacked and robbed
of their wallets and jewelry. X, Y and Z, membersof the
audience, capture footage of the criminals on a camera (non-
digital), a video-camera (non-digital) and a cellular-

, phonerespectively. The robbers are caught and charged with
robbery. Consider the following statements about the trial
evidenceand choose the correct option: 1. The photograph taken
by X can be regarded as documentary evidence because it is
used to represent somethingthat is the subject matter of the court
case. 2. According to S v Mpumlo 1986 (3) SA 485 (E) and S v
Baleka (1) 1986 (4) SA 192 (T) the videotape footage by Y
canbe classifi ed as documentary evidence. 3. The data message
captured on Z’s cellular phone depicting the robbery is
inadmissible and carries no evidentialweight. 4. According to S
v Singh 1975 (1) SA 330 (N) and S v Ramgobin 1986 (4) SA
117 (N) the videotape footage by Y can beclassifi ed as real
evidence. Clear my choice UNISA  2024  LEV3701-24-S2 
Welcome Message  Assessment 1 Question 3 Not yet
answered Marked out of 1.00 QUIZ Consider the following
statements and choose the correct option: 1. Microfi lm is
readable with the naked eye and is usually submitted for its
subject-content. It is therefore treated asdocumentary evidence.
2. The subject of a theft case is an historical photograph that was
stolen from a museum. The photograph will betreated as
documentary evidence. 3. A person is charged with the unlawful
possession of pornographic photographs. The court will treat the
photographsas real evidence. 4. “Offi cial documents” is another
term for public documents that are kept under the supervision or
control of theDirector of Public Prosecutions. Clear my choice
UNISA  2024  LEV3701-24-S2  Welcome Message 
Assessment 1 Question 4 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00
QUIZ The evidential value of a piece of evidence is important

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Jennifer2024. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77016 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.50  3x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart