HOORCOLLEGE 1.1: OVER ‘WIJ’ EN ‘ZIJ’ – (VAN SWAANINGEN – WEEK 1)........................................................5
OORLOG BEGINT MET WIJ-ZIJ-DENKEN........................................................................................................................5
DE ROL VAN PROPAGANDA EN ‘FAKE NEWS’.................................................................................................................5
Zondebokken....................................................................................................................................................5
EN DE MOED OM DAAR TEGENIN TE GAAN...................................................................................................................6
VLUCHTELINGEN OF GELUKSZOEKERS? PARADOX..........................................................................................................6
EU ASIELBELEID… STILZITTEN, WEGKIJKEN, AFSCHUIVEN.................................................................................................6
BEHOOR JE TOT ‘WIJ’ OF TOT ‘ZIJ’?............................................................................................................................6
VERVOLG VAN DIT COLLEGE.......................................................................................................................................7
‘RAS’ ALS SOCIALE CONSTRUCTIE................................................................................................................................7
‘OTHERING’: IEMAND TOT ‘DE ANDER’ MAKEN.............................................................................................................7
Othering...........................................................................................................................................................7
KORT HISTORISCH OVERZICHT HOUDING NEDERLANDERS T.O.V. VREEMDELINGEN................................................................7
Ratio achter houding Nederlanders t.o.v. immigranten (veiligheidsframe)....................................................8
Hoe immigratie een ‘probleem’ werd..............................................................................................................8
‘9/11’ (2001) ALS KEERPUNT IN HET DEBAT OVER DE MULTICULTURELE SAMENLEVING........................................................8
PERIODISERING RELATIE RAS EN CRIMINALITEIT IN DE CRIMINOLOGIE.................................................................................9
GESCHIEDENIS VAN RAS EN ETNICITEIT IN DE CRIMINOLOGIE............................................................................................9
WAAROM SCHREEF BONGER RAS EN MISDAAD (1939)?...............................................................................................9
Reacties op Bongers Ras en Misdaad...............................................................................................................9
VAN BEMMELEN, CRIMINOLOGIE: LEERBOEK DER MISDAADKUNDE (1942)........................................................................9
RELATIE ETNICITEIT EN CRIMINALITEIT: EEN TABOE ONDERWERP?...................................................................................10
Argument Bovenkerk (2003)..........................................................................................................................10
Het taboe over het debat over etniciteit (relatie tussen etniciteit en criminaliteit) doorbroken?.................10
IS ER SPRAKE VAN EEN ‘WEGKIJKCULTUUR’?...............................................................................................................10
Symbolische communicatie............................................................................................................................10
ROND 2020: WEER EEN KENTERING?.......................................................................................................................11
Black lives matter / zwarte piet / reflectie koloniale en slavernij verleden / ‘wokeness’..............................11
TEGENWOORDIG: ‘TEGEN DE WIND IN’.....................................................................................................................11
HOORCOLLEGE 1.2: IRREGULIERE MIGRATIE IN EEN DIGITALE WERELD (STARING)........................................11
INTERNATIONALE MIGRATIEVRAAGSTUKKEN. WAAR GAAT HET OVER?.............................................................................11
3 thema’s........................................................................................................................................................11
TRAJECTEN VAN ILLEGALITEIT...................................................................................................................................11
PUSHBACKS.........................................................................................................................................................12
HISTORISCH PERSPECTIEF MIGRATIE..........................................................................................................................12
Continuïteit in migratiebewegingen en verblijf..............................................................................................12
2. Restricties / restrictief toelatingsbeleid.................................................................................................................12
3. Integratie problematiek.........................................................................................................................................12
A.W. Stockwell: ‘Our Oldest National Problem’ (Irreguliere methoden van binnenkomst)...........................13
Historisch perspectief: Robert Park: Migrant is een ‘Marignal Man’............................................................13
Historisch perspectief: Paul Siu: ‘De Sojourner’ (NL: De vreemdeling)..........................................................13
The Chinese Laundryman..........................................................................................................................................13
Historisch perspectief: Bouman en Bouman (1952).......................................................................................13
Migratiemotieven...........................................................................................................................................13
DOMINANTE VERKLARINGEN...................................................................................................................................13
Neo-klassieke kijk op migratie: Ravenstein ‘Laws of migration’ (1885)........................................................13
Kritiek op neo-klassieke benaderingen......................................................................................................................14
1
, Migratiesysteem benaderingen.....................................................................................................................14
GASTCOLLEGE 1.3 – FAYAZ KHAIR KHWA (AFGHAANSE STUDENT)................................................................15
HOORCOLLEGE 2.1 – OVER GRENZEN (STARING – WEEK 2)...........................................................................15
TAALGEBRUIK RONDOM MIGRATIE............................................................................................................................15
De macht van taal en beeld...........................................................................................................................15
Woorden zijn niet neutraal........................................................................................................................................15
Beelden zijn niet neutraal..........................................................................................................................................15
TOEZICHT EN BEHEERSING VAN MIGRATIE..................................................................................................................16
Interne controle..............................................................................................................................................16
Externe controle (Fort Europa).......................................................................................................................16
EXTERNALISERING VAN GRENZEN..............................................................................................................................17
EU-Turkije deal...............................................................................................................................................17
Bilaterale overeenkomsten met Libië & Mali.................................................................................................17
(ON)BEDOELDE EFFECTEN VAN MIGRATIEBELEID EN TOEZICHT........................................................................................17
THEORETICAL NOTES FROM GRANOVETTER, PORTES, BOISSEVAIN, MAUSS, SAHLINS..........................................................17
Sociale netwerkbenadering............................................................................................................................17
Granovetter............................................................................................................................................................... 17
Alejandro Portes........................................................................................................................................................18
Sociaal kapitaal (Bourdieu)........................................................................................................................................18
Kenmerken van de sociale netwerk theorie..............................................................................................................18
Marcel Mauss (1925). The Gift. The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies..............................18
3 vormen van reciprociteit of wederkerigheid (Sahlins)............................................................................................18
WETENSCHAPPELIJK ONDERZOEK: IRREGULIERE MIGRATIE SINDS 1993............................................................................19
Onderzoekstoepassing 1: Illegale vreemdelingen in Nederland....................................................................19
Onderzoekstoepassing 2: De sociale organisatie van mensensmokkel.........................................................19
Onderzoekstoepassing 3: Gefragmenteerde reizen vanuit Eritrea en Syrië..................................................20
2 visies op arbeid & ongedocumenteerden....................................................................................................20
SLOTOPMERKINGEN, CONCLUSIES.............................................................................................................................20
RELATIE TUSSEN MOBILITEIT EN INTEGRATIE (RELATIE PB 1 + PB2)................................................................................21
GASTCOLLEGE 2.2 – SAMIRA (IND)............................................................................................................... 21
DE MIGRATIEKETEN...............................................................................................................................................21
Uitvoeringsorganisaties.................................................................................................................................21
IND................................................................................................................................................................... 21
(1) Asielmigratie.............................................................................................................................................22
Asielprocedure.......................................................................................................................................................... 22
(2) Reguliere migratie.....................................................................................................................................22
Reguliere procedure..................................................................................................................................................23
(3) Naturalisatie.............................................................................................................................................23
UITGEPROCEDEERD EN NU?....................................................................................................................................23
DILEMMA’S......................................................................................................................................................... 24
IND EN OEKRAÏNE................................................................................................................................................24
HOORCOLLEGE 3.1 (STARING – WEEK 3)....................................................................................................... 24
HOE ZIJN HEDENDAAGSE IRREGULIERE MIGRATIEBEWEGINGEN TE BEGRIJPEN? VERDER GAAN DAN DE DOMINANTE
MIGRANTENNETWERKBENADERING...........................................................................................................................24
Definitie migrantennetwerken.......................................................................................................................24
Toepassing van migrantennetwerkanalyse...................................................................................................25
Het beeld van mobiliteit.................................................................................................................................25
HOE SYRIËRS EN ERITREEËRS NAAR NL REISDEN..........................................................................................................25
Beeld van de reis van Syriërs en Eritreeërs.....................................................................................................25
VAN EEN MIGRANTENNETWERK NAAR EEN BREDE SOCIALE NETWERKBENADERING..............................................................26
GASTCOLLEGE 3.2 – NATIONAAL RAPPORTEUR MENSENHANDEL EN SEKSUEEL GEWELD TEGEN KINDEREN
(CONNY RIJKEN)........................................................................................................................................... 26
WETTELIJKE TAAK NATIONAAL RAPPORTEUR..............................................................................................................26
2
, THEMA’S VOOR 2022-2023..................................................................................................................................26
Focus 2023:....................................................................................................................................................26
DOELSTELLINGEN.................................................................................................................................................. 26
FENOMEEN ONDERZOEK.........................................................................................................................................27
Cross cutting issues........................................................................................................................................27
METHODEN VAN ONDERZOEK..................................................................................................................................27
DADER MONITOR MH...........................................................................................................................................27
MENSENHANDEL: 3 ELEMENTEN..............................................................................................................................27
WIE ZIJN DE SLACHTOFFERS EN WAT ZIJN DE GEVOLGEN VAN MENSENHANDEL..................................................................28
Wie worden slachtoffer?................................................................................................................................28
Vulnerability factors..................................................................................................................................................28
UITBUITINGSSITUATIE EN RELATIE MET DADER.............................................................................................................28
SLACHTOFFERBESCHERMING....................................................................................................................................28
B8/3 regeling (hoofdstuk B8/3 Vreemdelingencirculaire).............................................................................28
KNELPUNTEN IN DE STRAFPROCEDURE.......................................................................................................................28
KNELPUNTEN IN OPVANG SLACHTOFFERS...................................................................................................................29
Knelpunt: niet-Nederlandse migranten slachtoffer en route.........................................................................29
GRETA.............................................................................................................................................................. 29
SLACHTOFFERS MENSENHANDEL IN DE STRAFRECHTSKETEN............................................................................................29
Identificatie....................................................................................................................................................29
Perspectief slachtoffers..................................................................................................................................29
Perspectief politie, OM en hulpverlening.......................................................................................................30
Interactie met de politie, OM en hulpverlening.............................................................................................30
GASTCOLLEGE 3.3 – MIGRANTEN, ONZEKER WERK EN ARBEIDSUITBUITING IN NEDERLAND (RUBEN
TIMMERMAN)............................................................................................................................................. 30
ARBEIDSMIGRANTEN IN EUROPA: EEN SPANNING........................................................................................................30
DWANGARBEID EN BESTRIJDING VAN MENSENHANDEL IN NL.........................................................................................30
ARBEIDSMISBRUIK EN 'ERNSTIGE SCHADE'..................................................................................................................31
PRECARITEIT EN HET ‘NIEUWE WERKEN’....................................................................................................................31
ARBEIDSMIGRANTEN IN EUROPA: MOBIEL, FLEXIBEL, GOEDKOOP....................................................................................31
ARBEIDSMIGRANTEN IN NEDERLAND: ENKELE BASISPRINCIPES........................................................................................31
PHD RESEARCH: ARBEIDSMIGRANTEN IN NEDERLAND..................................................................................................32
Methodes.......................................................................................................................................................32
Arbeidsmarktmisbruik en werkgerelateerde schade.....................................................................................32
Op de arbeidsovereenkomst, uren en loon...............................................................................................................32
Over huisvesting en vervoer......................................................................................................................................32
VEILIGHEID OP DE WERKPLEK: ‘NO DEAD PEOPLE’: A CASE STUDY..................................................................................32
Precariteit begrijpen: de rol van het uitzendbureau......................................................................................32
CONCLUSIES.........................................................................................................................................................33
HOORCOLLEGE 4.1 – POLARISATIE EN UITSLUITING (VAN SWAANINGEN – WEEK 4)......................................33
GEMEENSCHAPPELIJKE DELER..................................................................................................................................33
PROBLEEM 3 EN 4................................................................................................................................................33
HET DEBAT DAT OP DE ACHTERGROND SPEELT............................................................................................................33
Excuses voor het slavernijverleden.................................................................................................................33
Koloniale roofkunst: teruggeven?..................................................................................................................33
Woorden die je wel of niet meer ‘mag’ gebruiken.........................................................................................34
Woorden die van betekenis veranderen........................................................................................................34
DE MULTICULTURELE SAMENLEVING.........................................................................................................................34
Het woord ‘Multiculturalisme’.......................................................................................................................34
REFLECTIE VAN TOEGENOMEN POLARISERING SAMENLEVING..........................................................................................34
ETNISCHE POLARISATIE IN NEDERLAND......................................................................................................................35
‘HET MULTICULTURELE DRAMA’ (SCHEFFER, 2000): TERUGBLIK OP 2000.......................................................................35
WAT IS CULTUUR?................................................................................................................................................35
WAT IS INTEGRATIE?.............................................................................................................................................35
INTEGRATIE EN CULTUUR VS. CRIMINOLOGIE..............................................................................................................36
3
, Paradoxale boodschap van neo-nationalisten: “Je moet integreren”... maar eigenlijk zien we je liever vertrekken
naar je ‘eigen’ land....................................................................................................................................................36
Ironie van de assimilatie...........................................................................................................................................36
Sociale Boulimia........................................................................................................................................................36
DE THEMATISERING VAN DE ISLAM EN DE MOSLIM......................................................................................................36
Continu worden aangesproken op daden van extremisten...........................................................................36
‘RACISME KOMT NIET ALTIJD MET EEN WITTE PUNTMUTS OP’........................................................................................36
Overt vs. covert racisme.................................................................................................................................36
HOORCOLLEGE 4.2 – INTEGRATIE EN CRIMINALITEIT (VAN SWAANINGEN)...................................................37
HOE ETNICITEIT EEN ‘PROBLEEM’ WERD.....................................................................................................................37
INTEGRATIEBELEID EN HOLLANDS EIGENBELANG..........................................................................................................37
HET BEGIN VAN HET INTEGRATIEBELEID.....................................................................................................................37
WAT IS EEN GESLAAGDE INTEGRATIE?.......................................................................................................................38
Parlementaire commissie ‘Onderzoek integratiebeleid’................................................................................38
Verwijten aan de overheid in 2004................................................................................................................38
GEEN INTEGRATIE, MAAR IDENTIFICATIE MET NEDERLAND (WRR 2007).........................................................................38
ENTZINGER & SCHEFFER (2012) DE STAAT VAN INTEGRATIE.........................................................................................38
BENADRUK HET VERSCHIL NIET ZO + MEER OOG VOOR HET SPIEGELBEELD........................................................................38
SOCIALE BOULIMIA EN ‘DE MAROKKAAN VAN HIER’ (BOUABID 2022).............................................................................38
Een paar citaten.............................................................................................................................................39
HOGE CRIMINALITEIT ALS OORZAAK EN GEVOLG..........................................................................................................39
CULTUUR EN CRIMINALITEIT....................................................................................................................................39
Etnische specialisatie......................................................................................................................................39
Analyse CBS en SCP t.a.v. hogere criminaliteitscijfers mensen met migratieachtergrond............................39
CRIMINALITEIT ONDER MAROKKANEN HOOG..............................................................................................................40
Bovenkerks analyse van de geïntegreerde Marokkaan in de media.............................................................40
CULTUUR OF SUBCULTUUR VS. CRIMINALITEIT.............................................................................................................40
RADICALISERING MOSLIMS ALS REACTIE OP VERNEDERING............................................................................................40
MOTIEVEN VOOR JIHADISTISCHE RADICALISERING........................................................................................................40
GASTCOLLEGE 4.3: AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL NL – ETNISCH PROFILEREN TIJDENS CONTROLES AAN DE
GRENS (GWEN VAN EIJK).............................................................................................................................. 40
OVER AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL.............................................................................................................................40
RECHTSZAAK TEGEN DE KONINKLIJKE MARECHAUSSEE..................................................................................................40
WAT DOET DE KONINKLIJKE MARECHAUSSEE?............................................................................................................41
Wat is een risicoprofiel?.................................................................................................................................41
DE RECHTSZAAK....................................................................................................................................................41
Rechtbank: Uitspraak.....................................................................................................................................42
Hoger beroep: Gerechtshof: Uitspraak..........................................................................................................42
BREDERE BETEKENIS: ONDERZOEK OUTLET ROERMOND................................................................................................42
HOE VERDER?......................................................................................................................................................42
Wat kan jij doen?...........................................................................................................................................42
HOORCOLLEGE 5.1 – DE ONVREDE VAN DE ‘GEWONE NEDERLANDER’ (VAN SWAANINGEN – WEEK 5)..........43
TOENAME SPREEKBEURTEN OVER DE ‘GEWONE NEDERLANDER’…...................................................................................43
Nationalistisch populisme..............................................................................................................................43
Centrale thema’s in het nationalistisch populisme........................................................................................43
Waarom slaat het nationalistisch populisme zo breed aan?.........................................................................43
BELANG EN GEVAAR VAN IDENTITEITSPOLITIEK............................................................................................................44
WIITE MENSEN: ‘NAAR ONS LUISTERT NOOIT IEMAND...’..............................................................................................44
OVERGEWAARDEERDE ‘BULLSHITJOBS’ EN ONDERGEWAARDEERDE ‘VITALE BEROEPEN’........................................................44
DE AANTREKKELIJKHEID/ATTRACTIVITEIT VAN POPULISME..............................................................................................44
WAAR LOOPT DEZE ANALYSE UIT DE RAILS?................................................................................................................45
Wie is die ‘elite’?............................................................................................................................................45
POLARISATIE EN SOCIALE BOULIMIE..........................................................................................................................45
MIGRATIE EN ONZEKERHEID IN EEN ‘VLOEIBARE’ SAMENLEVING......................................................................................45
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Noa1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.84. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.