100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
logo-home
Pla 3014 final test 1 questions & answers 2024/2025 $7.99
In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Pla 3014 final test 1 questions & answers 2024/2025

 0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Pla 3014
  • Instelling
  • Pla 3014

Pla 3014 final test 1 questions & answers 2024/2025 Lucy vs. Zehmer (property contract case) - ANSWERSthe complainants are entitled to have specific performance of the contract sued on (reverse and remanded) Hanks vs. McNeil (insane man sold coal company case) - ANSWERSthere is no basis for...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 6  pagina's

  • 16 augustus 2024
  • 6
  • 2024/2025
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
  • Pla 3014
  • Pla 3014
avatar-seller
Bensuda
Pla 3014 final test 1 questions &
answers 2024/2025

Lucy vs. Zehmer (property contract case) - ANSWERSthe complainants are entitled to have specific
performance of the contract sued on (reverse and remanded)



Hanks vs. McNeil (insane man sold coal company case) - ANSWERSthere is no basis for holding voidable
his sale here involved on the ground of his insanity



Stambovsky vs. Ackley - ANSWERSthe unusual facts of this case do disclose by vend, clearly warrant
grant of equitable relief to the buyer



Tierney vs. four H land company limited partnership - ANSWERSspecific performance was an appropriate
remedy for four h and western breach, and district court should have ordered it. Judgment was reversed
and remanded to have four h and western comply with contract



Hoffman vs. red owl stores - ANSWERSwe conclude that injustice would here if plaintiffs were not
granted relief because of failure of defendants to keep their promises which induced plaintiffs to act to
their determined



star valley ranch vs. Daley (home development case) - ANSWERSthe district court did not err in holding
that the amended covenants were invalid as they pertained to plats 1,2, and 3, of the star valley
subdivision



cnx vs. rasnake (deed case) - ANSWERSwe adopt that interpretation and hold that the circuit court erred
in construing the disputed language to constitute an unambiguous exception of all coal and other
minerals from the conveyance



Niesche vs. Wilkinson (Mary Lou and Robert fox died property case) - ANSWERScircuit court did not err
in ruling that Mary Lou had no ownership interest in the 960 acres

, kelo vs. Connecticut (eminent domain case) - ANSWERSbecause the plan unquestionably serves a public
purpose the takings challenged here satisfy the public use requirement of the 5th amendment



Martin vs. Bicknell (shared driveway case) - ANSWERSwe hold that the trial court erred in granting the
motion to dismiss (the martin's use of the driveway with Bicknell's was entirely consistent with an not
legitimate basis to dismiss their claim of prescriptive easement)



Cohen vs. bayside federal savings and loan (ring ($100) and auto accident case) - ANSWERScourt decided
carol should keep the ring because that result is equitable and because justice so requires



Lowe vs. Quinn (ring ($60000) married guy case) - ANSWERSbased on such reasoning the few courts
which have had occasion t consider the question he held that a plaintiff may not recover the
engagement ring or any other property he may have given the woman



executory contract - ANSWERScontract that has not yet been fully performed



executed contract - ANSWERS1 that has been fully performed



definition of contract - ANSWERStotal legal obligations which results from parties agreement as affected
by this act and any other applicable rule of law



elements of an offer - ANSWERS1. intent to make an offer on the part of the offeror

2. definite terms

3. communication to the offeree



offeror - ANSWERSparty making offer



offeree - ANSWERSparty accepting offer



elements of acceptance - ANSWERS1. communication to offeror

2. acceptance of the terms of offer

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Bensuda. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor $7.99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 64670 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Begin nu gratis
$7.99
  • (0)
In winkelwagen
Toegevoegd