In depth notes about Social Construction of Behaviour in Adultery with everything you need to know for your criminology lessons with key points included and smooth to read
India's top court has ruled adultery is no longer a crime, striking down a 158-year-old
colonial-era law which it said treated women as male property. Previously any man who had
sex with a married woman, without the permission of her husband, had committed a crime.
A petitioner had challenged the law saying it was arbitrary and discriminated against men
and women. It is not clear how many men have been prosecuted under the law - there is no
data available. This is the second colonial-era law struck down by India's Supreme Court this
month - it also overturned a 157-year-old law which effectively criminalised gay sex in India.
While reading out the judgement on adultery, Chief Justice Dipak Misra said that while it
could be grounds for civil issues like divorce, "it cannot be a criminal offence".
Last August, Joseph Shine, a 41-year-old Indian businessman living in Italy, petitioned the
Supreme Court to strike down the law. He argued that it discriminated against men by only
holding them liable for extra-marital relationships, while treating women like objects.
"Married women are not a special case for the purpose of prosecution for adultery. They are
not in any way situated differently than men," his petition said.
The law, Mr Shine said, also "indirectly
discriminates against women by holding an
erroneous presumption that women are the
property of men". In his 45-page petition, Mr
Shine liberally quotes from American poet
Ralph Waldo Emerson, women rights activist
Mary Wollstonecraft and former UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan on gender equality and the
rights of women. However, India's ruling BJP government had opposed the petition, insisting
that adultery should remain a criminal offence. "Diluting adultery laws will impact the
sanctity of marriages. Making adultery legal will hurt marriage bonds," a government
counsel told the court, adding that "Indian ethos gives paramount importance to the
institution and sanctity of marriage".
The law dictated that the woman could not be punished as an abettor. Instead, the man was
considered to be a seducer. It also did not allow women to file a complaint against an
adulterous husband. A man accused of adultery could be sent to a prison for a maximum of
five years, made to pay a fine, or both. And although there is no information on actual
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller amy131. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.58. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
