Class notes
La 104 - Gross Negligence and Reckless Manslaughter Notes
- Course
- Institution
This is a comprehensive and detailed note on Gross negligence and reckless manslaughter for criminal law. *Essential!! *Precise!! * For you!!
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
anyiamgeorge19
Reviews received
Content preview
Gross negligence and reckless manslaughterGross negligence manslaughter
Adomako (1994)
o 1 ‘whether or not the defendant has been in breach of
a duty of care towards the victim’ – duty of care and its
breach
o 2 ‘whether that breach of duty caused the death of the
victim’
o 3 ‘whether that breach of duty should be characterized
as gross negligence and therefore a crime’ – negligence
as mens rea and as standard of culpability
5 elements
A duty of care
Breach of the duty of care
Causation
A mens rea element: negligence as reasonable foresight
Standard of fault: negligence as gross
Duty of care
Adomako (1994): ‘ordinary principles of negligence apply – so
related to the civil law of torts
Examples: duty of care in doctor/ patient relationship
Wacker (2002) – people smuggling operation, number of people died
in lorry – duty of care in illegal enterprise contra tort law – public
policy ground
Evans (2009) – d supplied illegal drugs to half-sister V who died –
voluntary agency breaks causal chain
Miller (1983) – duty to avert danger from one’s own dangerous acts
gives rise to omissions liability
GNM? Held that an omission to act involved a duty to act which
could be the basis for a duty of care
Omission’s liability where D undertakes a duty of assistance by
their words or acts – Stone and Doblinson (1977) – duty of care
stems from her undertaking the duty to help V once she realizes he
is unwell and not following it through
Problems: liability is then a matter of a failure to care and delinked
from drug supply. Evan’s mother could also be liable
The problem of drug supply and subsequent death – fitting the
culpability to the law of manslaughter, where it doesn’t quite fit
Breach of duty of care
Did D’s conduct fall below how the reasonable person would
have acted? If it did, D breached her duty of care
How would a reasonable person have acted in the situation?
Causation must be proved
This is in line with standard requirements:
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anyiamgeorge19. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now