Essay

AQA ENG LANG A LEVEL EXAMPLE GENDER ANSWER

0 purchase

Course
Language diversity/change

Institution
AQA

An answer to the question... Womens talk is naturally cooperative and mens is naturally competitive. Revision for English Language AQA A Level paper 2. This was marked by my teacher and scored 26/30.

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2 pages

View example

Uploaded on August 17, 2024
Number of pages 2
Written in 2024/2025
Type Essay
Professor(s) Unknown
Grade A

genderlect
difference
dominance
deficit
perfromance
deborah cameron
lakoff
jesperson
tannen
rapport talk
dialects
cooperative
competitive

Study Level
A/AS Level
Examinator
AQA
Subject
English
Unit
Language diversity/change

$3.97

Also available in package deal from $13.91

Add to cart

Save

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Also available in package deal (1)

AQA A Level English language paper 2 example essays

$ 20.02 $ 13.91 5 items

1. Essay - Aqa a level english lang example answer paper 2
2. Essay - Aqa eng lang a level example gender answer
3. Essay - Aqa a level eng lang paper 2 answer
4. Essay - Aqa a level eng lang paper 2 example answer
5. Essay - Aqa a level eng lang paper 2 example
Show more

Evaluate the idea that women’s talk is naturally cooperative whereas men’s talk is
naturally competitive. (30)

The difference theory believes that men and women have innate differences in the style and function
of their speech and writing. Therefore,it is possible for women’s speech to be cooperative and men’s
as competitive because of the belief men and women’s language have different intentions. Deborah
Tanenn presented her theory of the Difference Approach, illustrating the way in which men and
women use language differently to reflect and reinforce their gender roles in society. Through
socialisation, girls are taught how to perform ‘femininity’ and be girls,this can be linked to the type of
language they then develop by teaching them to be more passive and not interrupt. However,boys are
taught to perform masculinity,for example by not telling boys off for using too loud language and using
the saying ‘boys will be boys’. This is due to the ideology that masculinity and femininity should be
binary opposites and it is undesirable to have traits associated with the opposite gender.
Therefore,there could be differences in the gender’s language due to socialisation. Tannnen builds on
this by giving examples of the genders' cross communication.She explains men are competitive and
use conversation to build status,this could be to appear ‘macho' and ‘alpha’ to others.
Whereas,women use conversation to give and receive support demonstrating compassion and
cooperation. Tannen also found men use imperatives in conversations which could give the
impression of competitiveness by giving orders to those they see as inferior whilst women use
politer,mitigated forms in order to come across less harsh and brutal. Furthermore, it can be argued
men use ‘report’ talk to show independent status and make their way up an imagined hierarchy in
conversations,whereas women use ‘rapport talk’ in order to connect and develop intimacy. This
provides evidence for the fact that women and men have differences in their speech codes. Thus
supporting the claim womens talk is naturally cooperative and mens is competitive. However, it may
be that in some cases there are little differences in genders languages,for example,sociologist Read
found in her study of teachers,both male and female teachers were just as likely to use the ‘male’
disciplinary discourse to talk to pupils.This speech code indicates dominance and control,so there
may not be as much difference in genders speak as Tannen suggests. It can also be criticised by the
dominance model which suggests differences are not due to innateness or socialisation but instead
due to the hierarchical dominance of men in society.

However, one idea questioning this statement is Deborah Cameron found that the idea of ‘bitching’ is
stereotypically a part of female language challenging the view that women’s language is cooperative.

The dominance theory of language suggests language differences such as those in the statement can
be explained by the hierarchical dominance of men in society. Zimmerman and West’s study
concluded that 96% of interruptions in conversations between men and women were from men. This
does suggest mens language is competitive as they use language to constantly hold the floor and
engineer others, especially womens, silence. Women are also seen to interrupt less, have shorter
turns and speak less, potentially indicating their cooperation as they are happy to let the man
overpower in the conversation, potentially in fear of causing conflict. Fishman also found women use
more tag questions than men (4 times as many) such as ‘y’know’, this was coined interactional
shitwork as Fishman concluded women do the work in conversations and this could be explained by
their inferior social status. The fact women have to actively work to maintain conversations with men
shows their cooperation as they aren’t willing to let the conversation die out. Women may also be
naturally cooperative as according to Dale Spender women who do interrupt are seen as rude and
domineering. However, as this view would suggest as women gain more equality in society, men and
women's language should become more equal. Therefore, this idea and its research lacks temporal
validity and may be outdated in today’s society.

On the other hand, deficit theory does not analyse the differences in genderlects as cooperative or
competitive, but simply argues women's language is always inferior to mens. For example, in the

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sjrevision. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66184 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling