Essay
AQA A LEVEL ENG LANG PAPER 2 ANSWER
- Course
- Institution
An answer to the question... Should schools ban non standard English. Revision for English Language AQA A Level paper 2. This was marked by my teacher and scored 27/30.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
sjrevision
Content preview
Evaluate the idea that schools should ban the use of non-standard language. [30marks]
Standard English is a dialect that is seen as a ‘correct’ way of speaking and is widely
encouraged in formal contexts such as schools. However, there are arguments as to say we
should not ban non standard English in schools.
One argument comes from prescriptivists who see Standard English as the only ‘correct’
way to speak. It can be argued that because Standard English is seen as basic literacy and
desirable, if we allow students to speak in non-standard language we would be
disadvantaging them in life. For example, the GCSE national curriculum states ‘ students
should be able to write effectively and coherently using Standard English appropriately’.
Therefore, if children were to use non-standard language then they may be deprived of such
qualifications having a significant impact on their future. Researchers have found that
teenagers are good at code switching and so banning non standard English in schools does
not mean pupils cannot speak in their own dialects outside of schools. For example, David
Crystal notes both street grammar and classroom grammar are needed to face all situations
in life. It is wrong to say teachers who correct non standard English are discriminatory as it
can be argued they are simply improving the life chances of their pupils. A school in
Halesowen banned Black country dialect and the headteacher explained the reason was due
to getting the best for their children. Headteacher, Mr White, said literacy was the school’s
biggest challenge with 40% of the intake on free school meals, and this was an attempt at
boosting the children’s academics. However, critics argue this is not an appropriate
approach to the situation and instead adds a stigma towards regional dialects which results
in accent bias. Ian Cushing also notes there is no evidence to say Standard English is
actually any more linguistically correct than any other dialect, this is simply a social
construct.
Linguist Ian Cushing argues strongly against the policing and correction of non standard
spoken grammar. Cushing notes it is a form of discriminative language policy. He draws on
the fact each variety of English is an entirely legitimate, grammatical set of socially
meaningful forms. Standard English, however, is seen as the institutional norm used in
contexts such as law, education, media and business. However, a misconception is
Standard English is incompatible with non-standard varieties, yet standard English can be
spoken in any accent. There is an increasing concern over accents as well as dialects where
a primary teacher was told by Ofsted to make her accent more ‘southern’ as it is too
northern. This is another example of how school is increasingly becoming a form of linguistic
purism which has negative effects on both teachers and staff who are being told they cannot
express their regional identities. Ian Cushing argues an approach may be to not treat non
standard English as ungrammatical which will not damage students' linguistic confidence.
Secondly, schools should develop students Standard English by adding to their grammatical
repertoire not replacing it. Finally, allowing pupils to discuss standard English and treat it
critically. Overall, Ian Cushing provides evidence to say schools banning non standard
English is simply blanket banning and may actually have a negative impact on their
achievement by creating a self fulfilling prophecy.
Another reason we should not ban non standard English in schools is because of the sense
of identity it may give pupils. Eckert shows teenagers are the movers and shakers of
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sjrevision. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.98. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
55628 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now