Exam (elaborations)

LEV3701 MCQ 1 LAW OF EVIDENCE OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2022/2023

0 purchase

Course
LEV3701 - Law Of Evidence

Institution
LEV3701 - Law Of Evidence

LEV3701 MCQ 1 LAW OF EVIDENCE OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2022/2023 MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A 2010 Second Semester – Assignment 1 Question 1 (a) If the current South African law does not provide a solution to an evidentiary problem, our courts will first of all search for the answer in the early Roman...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 29 pages

View example

Uploaded on August 21, 2024
Number of pages 29
Written in 2024/2025
Type Exam (elaborations)
Contains Questions & answers

lev3701 law of evidence
lev3701 mcq 1 law of evidence octobernovember 202

Institution LEV3701 - Law Of Evidence
Course LEV3701 - Law Of Evidence

MasterGrade Member since 4 year 27 documents sold

$8.49

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

LEV3701 MCQ 1 LAW OF EVIDENCE
OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2022/2023

,LEV3701 MCQ 1 LAW OF EVIDENCE OCTOBER/NOVEMBER
2022/2023

, lOM oARcPSD|2667034

MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS
EVI301-A

2010 Second Semester – Assignment 1

Question 1

(a) If the current South African law does not provide a solution to an evidentiary problem, our courts will first
of all search for the answer in the early Roman-Dutch law.
(b) Evidence obtained in a manner that violates the Constitution will always be inadmissible.
(c) Substantive law indicates which procedure must be followed to prove a case.
(d) The “facts in dispute” in a particular case are heavily influenced by the applicable substantive law.

(1) Only statements (a) and (b) are correct.
(2) Only statements (a), (b) and (d) are correct.
(3) Only statement (c) is correct.
(4) Only statement (d) is correct.
(5) All the statements are correct.

Question 2

(a) In the case of a residuary clause, our courts have to determine what the English law was
immediately before South Africa became a Republic in 1961.
(b) Roman-Dutch law is the common law of South Africa and therefore constitutes the historical source of our
substantive and formal law.
(c) In terms of section 35(1) of the Constitution, every arrested person has the right to adduce and challenge
evidence.
(d) A finding by a court that a particular piece of evidence is inadmissible due to irrelevance is final and cannot
be reconsidered during the course of the same trial.

(1) Only statement (a) is correct.
(2) Only statements (a), (b) and (c) are correct.
(3) Only statements (c) and (d) are correct.
(4) Only statements (a) and (d) are correct.
(5) All the statements are correct.

Question 3

(a) A person is charged with fraud in that he made a false statement to a financial institution. Evidence that this
person has, on previous occasions, made similar false statements to other financialinstitutions, is
hearsay evidence.
(b) A person is charged with fraud in that he made a false statement to a financial institution. Evidence that this
person has, on previous occasions, made similar false statements to other financialinstitutions, is
evidence about previous consistent statements.
(c) The accused, in trying to dispute the admissibility of a confession made while he was in detention, wants to
tender evidence that, on other occasions, the police have used improper means to get statements from him.
This evidence is evidence of previous consistent statements.
(d) The accused is charged with dealing in dagga. The fact that the accused has previously been convicted
of dealing in dagga is hearsay evidence.

(1) Only statement (a) is correct.
(2) Only statement (b) is correct.
(3) Only statement (c) is correct.
(4) Only statements (c) and (d) are correct.
(5) None of the statements is correct.

Question 4

(a) A similar fact may be distinguished from a previous consistent statement in that a similar fact willseldom,
if ever, take the form of a statement.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MasterGrade. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Exam (elaborations)

LEV3701 MCQ 1 LAW OF EVIDENCE OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2022/2023

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview