100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
With reference to these sources and your understanding of the historical context, assess the value of these sources in explaining the effectiveness of Heath as a political leader? $6.23
Add to cart
With reference to these sources and your understanding of the historical context, assess the value of these sources in explaining the effectiveness of Heath as a political leader?
12 views 0 purchase
Course
The Making Of Modern Britain 1951-2007
Institution
AQA
An A* 21/25 A-Level AQA History essay from the topic 'The Making Of Modern Britain, '. It is in reference to two sources, Source 2 and Source 3, and so can be used a reference of how to structure source questions. Includes references to provenance, content and tone.
With reference to these sources and your understanding of
the historical context. Assess the value of these sources in
explaining the effectiveness of Heath as a political leader?
(25)
The main value of source two lies in its content. It omits balance and a
fair attitude towards Heath as a Prime Minister. The language is
mostly positive, with Critchley stating that Heath was ‘warm and
friendly’ but also noting that his friends did not include Tory
backbenchers, revealing this balance in suggesting there was a slight
lack of unity but he was by no means cold or unfriendly. He also
expressed that he was ‘highly competent’, suggesting Heath was
capable but perhaps unlucky. We know that this could be true
considering the poor economy he inherited from Wilson and previous
strained relations between trade unions and the government. This
balance is valuable as it doesn’t feel like Critchley is favouring or
discrediting Heath one way or another, and so this presents itself as
honest and as a genuine observation, with the personal and public
Heath appearing to be covered.
However, there are limits in the value of source two due to the
provenance. Whilst Critchley was a conservative MP during Heath’s
premiership, he was a backbench conservative MP. Seeing as he
implies that Heath did not pay much attention to Tory backbenchers,
we can assume if we are reliant on this claim that Critchley wasn’t
especially close with Heath. Therefore, he would not have the best,
exclusively first hand knowledge to make as an accurate observation
of his premiership. This lack of truly insightful knowledge is furthered
by the fact that this autobiography was published in 1994 - twenty
years post Heath’s last year as Prime Minister. During this time,
Critchley would have served under Margaret Thatcher as a
backbencher years prior, and so he may have been more inclined to
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller francoisemaurer. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.23. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
