100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A Level Law Criminal Law Defences Essay plans $9.29   Add to cart

Other

A Level Law Criminal Law Defences Essay plans

 11 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

The document contain essay plans for all criminal law defences allowing you to have a variety of points. These essay plans with help you achieve high grades as there are strong points stated

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • August 23, 2024
  • 8
  • 2024/2025
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Criminal Law Defences Analysis & Evaluation Essays

Analyse and evaluate the law relating to the defence of Insanity (25 marks)

Paragraph 1 - Knowledge Defect in reasoning (R v Clarke), caused by a disease of the mind ( R v
and understanding (AO1) Kemp/R v Hennersey) that caused D not not to know the nature and
quality of his act and what he was doing was wrong (R v Windle).


What key points do you
want to explain in the first
section of your essay?



Paragraph 2 – choose a Outdated
specific area of the defence
and analyse (AO3) it – how ● Law on insanity comes from the 1843 case on M'Naghten.
can you do this? ● Many thing have changed since then so it probably needs
updating

● Proposals for reform- Royal Commission on Capital punishment
Evaluate (AO3) this area of
the defence – how can you suggested that the M'Naghten rules should be extended so that a
defendant would be considered insane if he could not prevent
do this?
himself from doing the act.


Paragraph 3 – choose a Social stigma
specific area of the defence
and analyse (AO3) it – how ● The word insanity carries a social stigma
can you do this? ● Reforms have suggested that insane should be replaced with “not
guilty on evidence of mental disorder”- perhaps remove some of
the stigma associated with an insanity verdict but this was never
Evaluate (AO3) this area of implemented
the defence – how can you
do this?



Paragraph 3 – choose a Legal definition of insanity
specific area of the defence
and analyse (AO3) it – how ● The definition of insanity is a legal definition rather than a medical
definition. The term should be defined by psychiatrists not judges.
can you do this?
● As a result of the legal definition people suffering from certain
mental disorders do not come within the defence e.g those
Evaluate (AO3) this area of suffering from irresistible urges (Bryne)
the defence – how can you
do this?



Paragraph 4 – conclusion – Overall the law on insanity is very outdated and needs to be reformed as it

, reach a judgement (AO3) has led for unfair outcomes in cases such as Bryne.



Overall do you think the law
in this area is effective?
Why/Why not? What is the
most important evidence to
support your conclusion?

Criminal Law Defences Analysis & Evaluation Essays

Analyse and evaluate the law relating to the defence of Automatism (25 marks)

Paragraph 1 - Knowledge Automatism covers situations where the body acts independently of the
and understanding (AO1) mind.

● Involuntary act (AGR 2)

What key points do you ● Caused by a external factor ( R v Narborough)
want to explain in the first
section of your essay? ● Need for medical evidence- ( Hill v Baxter)

● Self-induced- Bailey

Paragraph 2 – choose a Overlap between insane and non- insane automatism
specific area of the defence
and analyse (AO3) it – how ● Deciding whether the situation is one of insanity or automatism is
difficult
can you do this?
● Situations which would seem to the non-lawyer to be ones of non-
insane automatism such as diabetic being in a high blood sugar
Evaluate (AO3) this area of state, or someone sleep- walking may at law be considered to be
the defence – how can you insane automatism.
do this?



Paragraph 3 – choose a Confusion and unfairness in cases where it was self- induced
specific area of the defence
and analyse (AO3) it – how ● For example, the defence of automatism can be available to those
who have committed crimes of specific intent, but is not available
can you do this?
to crimes of basic intent, which in itself is difficult for non-legal
personnel to differentiate between.

Evaluate (AO3) this area of
the defence – how can you
do this?



Paragraph 3 – choose a Complete loss of control
specific area of the defence
and analyse (AO3) it – how ● May create unfair outcomes in individual cases as partial loss of
control may still cause the same actions as a full loss of control

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller laxmikitaure. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.29
  • (0)
  Add to cart