100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Phil 170 Quiz 1 Questions With Collect Answers $8.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Phil 170 Quiz 1 Questions With Collect Answers

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Phil 170
  • Institution
  • Phil 170

Phil 170 Quiz 1 Questions With Collect Answers accident fallacy - Answer -A general rule is applied to a specific case that it wasn't intended for. (ex. Cutting people with a knife is a crime. Surgeons cut people with knives. Surgeons are criminals.) .affirming the consequent - Answer -if x, ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • August 25, 2024
  • 6
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Phil 170
  • Phil 170
avatar-seller
kartelo
accident fallacy - Answer -A general rule is applied to a specific case that it wasn't
intended for. (ex. Cutting people with a knife is a crime. Surgeons cut people with
knives. Surgeons are criminals.)

.affirming the consequent - Answer -if x, then y
y
therefor, x

.ambiguity - Answer -if expression can be interpreted as having more than one distinct
meaning in a given context
-ex: "light" beer

.amphiboly fallacy - Answer -occurs when the arguer misinterprets an ambiguous
statement and then draws a conclusion based on this faulty interpretation

.appeal to force fallacy - Answer -persuade by threat of force rather than providing
sound reasons

.appeal to ignorance fallacy - Answer -the premises of the argument claim that nothing
has been proven about something in one way, but the conclusion makes a definite
assertion about that thing
- exception: if qualified researcher investigating existence of something and no evidence
to support the thing exists, then no fallacy

.appeal to pity fallacy - Answer -requesting sympathy rather than providing sound
reasons

.appeal to the people fallacy - Answer -an appeal to a majority of people to prove that
one's view is correct

.appeal to unqualified authority fallacy - Answer -argument that appeals to an authority,
but that authority lacks credibility
- exception: if authority appealed to is credible, then no fallacy

.argument - Answer -a group of statements claimed to provide support for conclusion

.argument against the person (ad hominem) - Answer -Involves attacking the person
who advances an argument (or asserts a statement) as opposed to providing a rational
critique of the argument (or statement) itself

, .begging the question fallacy - Answer -when an arguer creates the illusion that
premises provide adequate support for the conclusion in:
- leaving out a key premise( that supports the argument)
- restating a contentious premise as the conclusion
- reasoning in a circle

.cogent - Answer --strong
-has all true premises

.cognitive meaning - Answer -terminology that conveys information

.complex question fallacy - Answer -involves asking a question that illegitimately
presupposes some conclusion alluded to in the question

.composition fallacy - Answer -occurs when the conclusion of an argument depends on
mistakenly taking an attribute of the parts of something to apply to the whole
- exception: if attribute does apply to the whole, then no fallacy

.conclusion - Answer -main claim supported by premises

.conditional statements - Answer -if...then... statements
-not arguments by themselves
-can be premises in arguments

.conventional connotation - Answer -what a term commonly connotes to the average
person

.correct reasoning with conditional - Answer --modus ponens
-modus tollens

.counter example method - Answer -for testing validity

1. pick out premises and conclusion
2. paraphrase (if needed)
3. pick out form of argument
4. see if you can construct a substitution instance of the argument that has true
premises and a false conclusion

.deductive argument (absolute) - Answer -author intends that it is impossible for the
premises to be true and the conclusion false

.definiendum - Answer -word to be defined

.definiens - Answer -words that do the defining

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller kartelo. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76462 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart