100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Roman Law 271 entire year summary $6.24   Add to cart

Summary

Roman Law 271 entire year summary

1 review
 100 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

An in-depth document covering all of the work done in the year (semester 1 & 2). Includes notes made in class & textbook & additional material summaries. set out in an organised manner which makes the subject easy to understand. This covers all of the prescribed work done which will form part of th...

[Show more]
Last document update: 5 year ago

Preview 4 out of 71  pages

  • Yes
  • November 4, 2019
  • November 5, 2019
  • 71
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: andreagaylenicor • 1 year ago

very useful

avatar-seller
Law of things
Definition of Res (thing)
 Wider than the concept of ‘thing’ today
 Any asset with economic value
 Corporeal (corporals) & incorporeal (incorporales)
o Corporeal: something tangible (horse, car, pen)  you can possess it
o Incorporeal: something you can’t touch (usufruct, inheritance, obligation) can’t possess
o Distinction NB: only corporeal things can be acquired through usucapio (rights you have over
corporeal/incorporeal differ)
 Only corporeal things could be subject to ownership

Classification of property:
 Gaius’ Institutes contains statements on prop classification
o Subject to human or divine control
o Corporeal or incorporeal (res mancipi & res nec mancipi)
 Justinian Institutes made changes to Gaius’ Institutes:
o Category of res mancipi & res nec mancipi removed
o Types of classification of property were expanded

Classification of things
Corporeality:
 Distinction emerged in later Republican period

Res corporals:
 Can be possessed & acquired through usucapio
 Can be touched

Res incorporales:
 Can’t be acquired or possessed through usucapio
 Can’t be touched
 E.g. inheritance, obligations in contract, limited real rights (e.g. servitudes)

Public things:
Res communes:
 can be used / enjoyed by everyone (air, sea, running water)
 law recognized right to enjoy these things (even through no ownership is possible)
o interfering with others’ enjoyment rights could end up in delictual consequences
 was part of res publicae, but got split in late classical period

Res publicae:
 public things belonging to the state
 e.g. roads, harbours, bridges, provincial land
 rivers which flowed all year round were res publicae
 interdicts could be used to prevent people from stopping public enjoyment of res publicae.
Res universitas:
 things belonging to a specific municipality/ colony for use by that community (park, stadium, theatre)
 from late classical period was described as res publicae, until Justinian period split it into separate category

Res nullius (things belonging to no one):
 some res nullius could be acquired or owned like wild animals, or other prop through occupatio

res sanctae
 things under protection of the gods & NB to Rome’s safety
 e.g. city walls, gates etc.
res religiosa

,  things dedicated to the underworld gods
 evidence that Romans had little care for these resnot being owned – still paid for them.
 e.g. graves, tombs, cemeteries

res sacrae
 dedicated to heavenly gods
 E.g. temples, basilicas, shrines, churches & temple equipment

sea shore
 uncertain classification  lacked clear legal identity
 they enjoyed by public but belong to no one (don’t belong to the community, not res communes or publicae)
 no one can own part of seashore but may build shelters etc.
o shelter becomes the builder’s property
o needed decree from praetor authorizing building
o could not build on the seashore if public use of the shore was impeded

Private things:
Res mobiles (movables) & res immobiles (immovable):
 Immovable: land & permanent land attachments
o Distinction between land:
 Italic land: res mancipi
 Provincial land: res nec mancipi
 distinction NB for prescription periods, possessory interdicts, constitution of servitudes

Res & res non fungibiles :
 Fungibles: Generic things that can be replaced e.g. bricks, grain, tiles, money, food
o Consumable goods res consumptibiles
o Republic era: usufructs couldn’t be given ito fungibles
o Sale could only take place through stipulatio
 Non-fungible: specific things e.g. slave, art, table (when you buy you specify what you want)
o Degree of permanence, not consumed
o Could be sold through emptio venditio
 Distinction NB for contract types

Divisible & indivisible:
 Relevant for division of prop held in co-ownership
 If you divide it, it loses its value (e.g. horse)  indivisible
 Divisible: land, fabric, food etc.

Res Mancipi: !!
 Distinction abolished in Justinian era
o Use of mancipatio & cessio decreased & bonitary ownership increased
 Dominium transferred through formal methods only (Mancipatio & in iure cessio)
 Things that determine the wealth of citizens for purposes of the census & which required formal transfer
methods to allow dominium to pass.
o Slaves, Italic (not provincial) land & land of the same status, beasts of drought & burden, rural
praedial servitudes
 Beasts of drought & burden: oxen, mules, horses, donkeys
 Limited category & could not be expanded or amended
 Most NB things in early agrarian society, incl. specific things of high value to early Roman life

Res Nec Mancipi: !!
 Everything else not incl. in res mancipi
 incl. camels & elephants (can also be used as beasts of drought & burden but not classified as such)
 Transferred through informal transfer methods like occupatio or traditio

,Ownership:
 Romans lacked precise concept of what ownership was
 Paterfamilias exercised control over all people/ things in household in early Rome
 Element of community of property may have existed in early Rome
 Social & economic changes, intellectualization of Roman law & civil procedure changes led to transition of an
uncertain concept of ownership to the technical concept of dominium
 Cessio, mancipatio & traditio were the Roman modes of transferring property inter vivos

Content (nature of ownership)
 Romanists: not jurists, studied law after the fact
 Can only own corporeal things, not incorporeal things
 Dominium endows owner with full power over the res, but power is subject to limitations
o Ownership described as unlimited/ exclusive, but only in principle
 E.g. usufructs, rent etc.
 Initially: no definition of ownership (Rome started as primitive society – no need for such definitions)
 Content can differ from full rights to use & enjoyment to nuda proprietas (bare ownership)
 Differs from iura in re aliena (rights in another’s things – limited real rights)
 Ownership can be limited through:
o Public law
o Corpses (can’t burn them on your prop if you live in a city)
o Slaves (can’t kill your slaves even if they’re yours)
o Misuse of right
o Rights of others
o Retention, exercise or rights of 3rd parties (e.g. contracts for rent etc.)
o Neighbour law (e.g. rules of overhanging branches, physical boundary limitations)
 E.g. you can’t plant trees within 5 meters of the boundary

Land:
 General rule: landowner owns everything above & below his ground
 Ownership couldn’t be divided vertically, only horizontally
o E.g. a field could be divided into areas, but a block of flats could not, since flats are vertical
 Inhabitants of upper flats could only be tenants with contractual rights
o Decrees in Empire passed to allow the State rights in precious minerals found underground
o 12 Tables made some exceptions

Restrictions on owners:
 restrictions mostly inspired by public policy considerations
 most restrictions come from archaic period & some from classical period
 12 tables:
o had to be at least 5ft. of open space between neighbouring property
o trees couldn’t be planted within 5ft. of the boundary line
o rules existed re: overhanging branches, fruit from neighbour’s trees, smoke from factories, wall
protrusion etc.
o restriction on house demolition
o allowed neighbours to act to prevent water damage from neighbour’s land or from neighbour’s
defective property
 restrictions in place to keep peace in community
 owner’s prop suffering damage from adjacent property construction could have praetor stop construction
 neighbour law was NB: must show respect for neighbour’s property
 unreasonable blocking of light/ views was restricted
 co-ownership also resulted in some restrictions so that all owners could collectively enjoy property

Dominium (ex iure quirtium)
 Roman ownership (ius civile)
 Applicable to all objects under control of paterfamilias (things, wife & children)  corporeal things

, o only later was there differentiation between wife/ kids & objects
 Some foreigners granted commercium (right to trade & have dominium)
o Right to participate in ius civile processes: formal contracts, conveyances, & legal remedies in court
o Excl. right to Conubium (entering civil marriage) & testamenti factio (making valid will, being witness
to will & being beneficiary of will).
 Most NB/ strongest right you could have over a res – oldest form of title
o Ownership described as unlimited & absolute (only in principle – restrictions apply)
 Can’t acquire dominium over stolen things (res furtiva) – even if you didn’t know if was stolen
 Can acquire dominium over res mancipi & res nec mancipi (method of acquiring ownership differs)
 Very strict procedures for transfer methods – lack of legal knowledge was a problem

Conditions for dominium :
must have commercium
 Meant only Roman citizens & foreigners with commercium could acquire dominium
 Peregrine ownership applied to foreigners w/o commercium (not under ius civile)

property must be capable of being privately owned
 Dominium couldn’t be acquired over things that couldn’t be privately owned
 Provincial land was probably most NB form of non-privately owned property
o Belonged to the public or Emperor
o Rented through specific lease form: provincial ownership
 Lacked dominium but was in practice close to full ownership & could be easily transferred
o Became obsolete in Justinian era when distinction between Italic & Provincial land was abolished

property must have been acquired through proper transfer methods
 Must be transferred formally through mancipatio or cession – both had specific requirements
o During Republic, formal modes of acquisition were seen as cumbersome
o Traditio used more often to transfer property – praetors protected transferee’s interests by
developing bonitary ownership

Praetorian Ownership (aka Bonitary ownership)
 Flows from distinction between res mancipi & res nec mancipi
 Acquire this through the praetorian’s protective measures, not through ius civile
o Similar to dominium due to praetor’s protective measures
 Only roman citizens or foreigners with trade rights could acquire this
 Reason we have this is because we have res mancipi (formal transfer methods) & res nec mancipi
o If parties didn’t transfer res mancipi properly, original owner still owned the res & this creates an
unfair position
o Bonitary ownership gave transferee the praetor’s protection until dominium could be acquired
 Interim measure (i.e. if strict transfer methods weren’t correctly followed)
 Disuse in post-classical period: distinction between res mancipi & res nec mancipi disappeared after Justinian

Co-ownership(Communio):
 Definition: Property belonging to more than 1 person (communio)

Modes of origin:
 Consortium: comes about through testamentary succession (2 brothers inheriting land from father) OR
through legis actio procedure  oldest form of co-ownership
 Communio pro indiviso/ condominium: co-ownership in indivisible shares (voluntary partners)
o co-ownership & partnership isn’t the same thing
o Developed in classical & post-classical period
 Mixing & mingling: e.g. when you have 2 bottles of wine mixed together (no longer distinguishable shares,
you become co-owners)
General principles:
 While co-ownership continues, relationship between parties is like that of partners
 Co-owners share profits & losses proportionate to their claim in the co-ownership %

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller notesattorney. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.24  3x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart