Summary of my lecture notes and readings for every module in MELS (Modern English Legal System). Written in 'question-answer' format to help with memorising and covers all major issues, cases, etc. for the multiple choice exam.
Helped me get 100% on the exam, so hopefully it helps you too!
● R v HARRIS
○ ‘Cut, stab and wound’ indicated use of instrument/weapon
○ Teeth aren’t a weapon so biting not an offence under Act
● FISHER v BELL
○ Exposing knives in window wasn’t offering for sale
● STOCK v FRANK JONES (TIPTON) Ltd
○ Set out criteria for using the golden rule
● R v ALLEN
○ Golden rule used to interpret Act about bigamy
○ Argued second marriage wasn’t legitimate because of incest
○ Bigamy would be impossible as bigamy is never legitimate
○ Means marriage was interpreted as going through ceremony
● Re SIGSWORTH
○ Act about intestacy didn’t prohibit murderer from inheriting
○ Wasn’t the purpose so was interpreted as being prohibited
● GORRIS v SCOTT
○ Contagious Diseases Act solved mischief of spreading disease
○ Meant animals only need to be penned to prevent disease
○ Non-contagious animals not being penned not an offence
● SMITH v HUGHES
○ Street Offences Act intended to clean up streets
○ Meant cleaning streets of both prostitutes and customers
○ Soliciting customers from above the street still an offence
● R v MONTILLA
○ Confirmed marginal notes are part of the contextual scene
● PEPPER v HART
○ Set out criteria for referring to Hansard
○ House of Lords deciding if teacher had to pay tax on perk
○ Teacher relied on statement made at time Finance Act passed
● ZAFAR v DIRECTOR of PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
○ Set out additional criteria for referring to Hansard
, PRECEDENT
● WHITTALL v KIRBY
○ Special reasons for non-disqualification of driver defined
○ Being a ‘professional driver’ was not included
● FOOD CORP of INDIA v ANTCLIZO SHIPPING CO
○ Set out criteria for Supreme Court not following precedent
○ Isn’t followed because there’s never only one principle
● YOUNG v BRISTOL AEROPLANE CO. Ltd
○ Set criteria for Court of Appeal not following Supreme Court
● LEEDS CITY COUNCIL v PRICE
○ Conflict between post-1998 decision and later ECtHR decision
○ Appellants claimed order to move infringed Article 8
○ Was a conflicting decisions in House of Lords and ECtHR
○ House of Lords decision was followed over ECtHR
○ Meant absolute right to possession of land didn’t violate it
● DONOGHUE v STEVENSON
○ Contained persuasive obiter dicta of the neighbour principle
● R v WOODWARD and R v PLEYDELL
○ Former found holding alcohol isn’t evidence of consumption
○ Latter used evidence of cocaine injection prior to driving
○ Meant cases were distinguished because of material facts
● DODDS v WALKER and PACITTI JONES v O’BRIAN
○ Former (tenancy law) defined ‘month’ as a calendar month
○ Latter held employment start and end dates need to be
counted when calculating continuous service
○ Meant cases were distinguished because of reasoning employed
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ambershah. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.97. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
