Media Psychology summary of scientific articles | IMEM/CB | Year 2
54 views 6 purchases
Course
Media Psychology (PRJ2)
Institution
Breda University Of Applied Sciences
I passed this course with a 9.3!
Summary of Media psychology
Project 2
Creative Business | IMEM
Breda University of Applied Sciences
Week 1: Psychology of entertainment (2006), CH9 The psychology of disposition-based theories of media enjoyment
Week 2: Communication theory (2004), Enjoyment: At t...
Media psychology | PRJ 2
WEEK 1 | Psychology of Entertainment (2006)
CH 9 The Psychology of Disposition-Based Theories of Media Enjoyment
- Disposition theories: explain how individuals judge and connect (affiliate) with media characters
➢ & how their enjoyment is influenced by what happens to those characters
▪ Enjoyment = individual level phenomenon – subjective
➢ Disposition = how you feel about a character
- First theory by Zillmann and Cantor (1972): disposition theory of Humor
➢ Later applied to other media content, try to develop a general disposition theory
Disposition theory of humor – by Zillmann and Cantor (1972)
- Until early 1970s works focuses upon humorous situations containing disparagement of another
➢ Concluded people find disparagement funny as long as they don’t belong to the insulted party
➢ Did not research if it became funnier if people had a potential dislike for the insulted party
- First limitation: question if disparagement jokes become funnier if people dislike the insulted party
➢ Zillmann and Cantor (1972) stated that we form affective dispositions towards characters
➢ Continuum of affective dispositions = scale on how we feel about a character
▪ Ranging from extreme negative trough a neutral point (no feeling) to extreme positive
➢ Enjoyment higher the more negative disposition held towards disparaged character, and/or more
positive disposition held towards the character responsible for the disparagement
▪ E.g. maximal humor appreciation when our friends embarrass our enemies
- Second limitation: we respond to quickly to make use of cognitive effort to understand a disparaging joke
➢ Takes too much time to first assign insulted person to a group and then compare to own group
➢ Researchers contended that we first identify the roles and activity of a character
▪ When associated with positive experiences: react with empathy
▪ When associated with negative experiences: react with counter empathy
➢ So empathy governs reaction to characters in humorous situations containing disparagement
- Third: stated that affiliations were based on personality and therefor stable and consistent
➢ Zillmann and Cantor argued that responses to humorous situations vary across time
▪ Emotional state plays a significant role – dynamics of an individual’s effect
- Why jokes that offers no or little description of its characters still funny? – no affective disposition
➢ Argued that we react in situation because of affective dynamics
➢ React with negative emotions towards insulted group: can therefore enjoy the joke
- Lots of other studies support the disposition theory of humor
Disposition theory of drama – by Zillmann and Cantor (1976)
- Enjoyment increases when liked characters experience positive outcomes and/or when disliked
characters experience negative outcomes – and decreases when the other way around
- Just like the disposition theory of humor, form affective dispositions with the characters
Danique de Haas | 180947
, ➢ However, selection of (un)favored characters cannot be capricious, must be morally justified
▪ Joke offers excuse to find humor in the misfortune of others, drama does not
➢ Positive dispositions with character whose actions and motivation we judge as morally correct
- Emotional involvement in drama is governed by moral judgement and affective dispositions
➢ Ones characters are liked, able to empathize with them and hope for their triumph
➢ The stronger the positive feelings, the stronger our empathic reaction – empathy is key
➢ When no feelings towards character, no emotional response and consequently no enjoyment
- Individuals have a unique moral composition, therefor their dispositions will vary
➢ People think/respond to characters differently – enjoyment of one program varies per person
- Support of this theory is found in the early studies of Zillmann and Cantor (1972)
➢ Zillmann and Bryant (1975) established the role of moral judgement – three fairy tale versions
▪ Children of different levels of moral judgement making different decisions
➢ Raney (2002) further examined the role of moral judgement – two crime-punishment videos
Disposition theory of sports spectatorship – by Zillmann, Bryant, & Sapolsky (1989)
- Developed by applying disposition-based principals to sporting events
- Dedication for a team/player can be seen as a continuum of affect – intense liking through disliking
- Enjoyment will increase the more the viewer like the winning team and/or dislikes the losing team
- Several studies have found support
➢ Zillmann, Bryant, and Sapolsky (1989) – measured enjoyment of National Football League watchers
➢ Zillmann – measured enjoyment of Olympic basketball game between US and Yugoslavia
▪ US students enjoyed when US team scored, even more enjoyment from former student players
➢ Sapolsky (1980) – high-school basketball competition between all-black and all-white team
Psychological factors associated with disposition-based theories
1. Enjoyment or appreciation of media content
- Theories cannot predict whether a character will be liked or disliked
➢ However, it serves at an understanding of the process of how people enjoy
- Additional research is needed as not yet everything is fully determined
➢ Need to better understand wat enjoyment really is – is it the same as appreciation?
➢ Vorderer, Klimmt, and Ritterfeld (2004) developed a conceptual model – more info needed
➢ Escapism motivation expressed – how does the disposition theory influence escapism
2. Emotional responses to media
- Individuals differences in empathy influence the extent and manner in which they respond to characters
- Cognition, particularly moral judgement, are key in the disposition-formation process
- Distinctions between affect (empathy) and cognition (moral) hard to measure in reality
3. Media enjoyment starts with and is driven by the viewer’s feelings about characters
- Identify psychological factors influencing feelings about characters
➢ Such as level of empathy, moral judgement, content features (camera movements, music), or age
➢ Could also be prior exposure to an actor: prior attitudes towards media characters
➢ Viewers not encountering narratives empty minded because of existing story schemes
4. Affiliations towards characters are formed and maintained on a continuum from 😊 through 😐 to ☹
- Early humor theories conceptualizing affiliations as dichotomous were proved ineffective
Danique de Haas | 180947
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Daniquedhs. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.82. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
