This document is a detailed essay plan for a unit 3 scenario question on fatal offences (murder, voluntary/involuntary manslaughter).
I have used the IDEA structure as provided by the WJEC guidance. You can use the same material for each fatal offences scenario, adjusting the application (as hi...
The scenario is concerned with the issue of fatal offences. The actions of (person in
the scenario) must be considered in light of relevant case law. In defining and
explaining the relevant law, it will be possible to establish whether (person in the
scenario) is criminally liable for the death of (victim in the scenario).
Murder is a common law offence, and the definition comes from Lord Coke in 1613.
It is defined as ‘The lawful killing of a human being, under the King’s peace with
malice aforethought.’
Actus Reus
Identify: A human being must be dead
Define: A person can only be convicted of murder it has actually resulted in the
death of a human being. According to AG’s Ref (No.3 of 1994), a person is a human
being as soon as it can exist independently of its mother. There has been much
controversy over what constitutes ‘dead’ but it would seem that the courts favour
the definition of ‘brain dead’ and this was confirmed in R v Malcharek and Steel
(1981).
Apply: Can the victim in the scenario exist independently of its mother? Are they
brain dead? If so, the defendant in the scenario may be criminally liable for their
death.
Identify: Factual Causation
Define: The ‘but for’ test has been established by case law in order to determine
whether the defendant is the factual causation of the victim’s death. It asks, ‘but
for’ the conduct of the defendant, would the victim have died as and when they did?
In R v White (1910), the defendant poisoned his mother with the intent to kill her.
However, she died of a heart attack before the poison could take effect, therefore
he was not the factual cause.
Apply: ‘But for’ the defendant in the scenario’s actions, would the victim have died
as and when they did? If they would have died anyway, the defendant will not be
the factual cause and will not be criminally liable.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lydiadavies. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.62. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
