100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Social Influence $3.99
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. AQA
  4.  
  5. Psychology
  6.  
  7. Social Influence

Class notes

Social Influence
 0 purchase
  • Course
  • Social Influence
  • Institution
  • AQA

Involves notes on: - Types and Explanations of Conformity - Asch's Research - Zimbardo's Research on Social Roles - Obedience Studies and Situational Factors - Milgram's Research - Dispositional Explanations - Resistance to Social Influence - Minority Influence - Social Change Involves st...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

Document information

  • September 8, 2024
  • 14
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • -
  • All classes

Subjects

  • conformity
  • asch
  • zimbardo
  • milgram
  • obedience
  • minority influence
  • social change
  • experiments
  • resistance to social influence
  • dispositional explanations

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • AQA
  • Psychology
  • Social Influence
All documents for this subject (615)

Seller

avatar-seller
parimahe

Content preview

Social Influence:

Types and Explanations of Conformity:
● Conformity is a type of social influence involving a change in belief or behaviour in order to
fit in with the group
○ This change is in response to real or imagined social pressure
● Types of conformity:
○ Internalisation: when a person genuinely accepts the group norms, both in public
and in private
■ Strongest form of conformity
○ Identification: a person changes their public behaviour and private beliefs, but only
when they are in the presence of the group
■ Usually only a short-term change and normally the result of normative social
influence
○ Compliance: ‘going along with others’ in public, but internally or privately, not
changing personal opinions
■ This results in only a superficial change and stops when the group pressure
stops
■ Weakest form of conformity
● Deutsch & Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory which aimed to explain why
people conform
○ Informational Social Influence (ISI)
■ Cognitive process → you conform because you want to be right
■ This occurs when we look to the majority group for information as we are
unsure about the way in which to behave
● A person will conform because they genuinely believe the majority
to be right so look to them for the right answer
○ Normative Social Influence (NSI)
■ Emotional process → you conform because you want to be liked
■ This occurs when we wish to be liked by the majority group, so we go along
with them even though we may not agree with them
● This is following the crowd in order to fit in with the ‘norm’ and be
liked by the group
● Lucas et al. (2006) asked students to give answers to mathematical problems, getting harder
○ Greater conformity to incorrect answers when they were difficult rather than easier
○ + Supports ISI → demonstrates people conforming when they don’t know the
answer
● NSI doesn’t affect everyone’s behaviour in the same way - people who are less concerned
about being liked are less affected than those who cared about being liked
○ E.g. Perrin & Spender’s Asch-recreated with engineering students study
○ - The two-process theory does not consider differences between people
● The idea is that the two processes work separately, however, they can work together
○ - Goes against what the two-process theory states

, Asch’s Research (1951):
● Aim: to investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a
person to conform
● Procedure: Asch tested conformity by showing participants two large white cards at a time:
one card was a ‘standard line’ and on the other card were three ‘comparison lines’
○ Out of the three comparison lines, one was the same length as the standard line and
the other two were clearly wrong
○ Participants were asked which of the three lines matched the standard line
■ The participants were 123 American male undergraduate students
○ Each naive participant was tested individually within a group of between six and
eight confederates
■ The naive participants were not aware that the other ‘participants’ were
confederates
○ A trial is defined as one occasion identifying the length of a standard line
○ Initially, all confederates gave the right answers but then they started purposely
making errors - all confederates were instructed to give the same wrong answer
○ Altogether, each participant took part in 18 trials and 12 ‘critical trials’ in which the
confederates gave the wrong answer
● Findings: the naive participant gave a wrong answer on average 36.8% of the time
○ Overall, 25% of the participants did not conform on any trial → 75% did
○ The term, ‘Asch effect’, has been used to describe the result - the extent to which
participant conform even when the situation is unambiguous
○ When participants were interviewed afterwards, most said they conformed to avoid
social rejection - supports NSI
● Asch’s variation studies → investigated conditions that might lead to a change in conformity
○ Group size: adding three confederates increased conformity to 31.8%
○ Unanimity: the presence of a dissenting participant reduced conformity to ¼ of what
it was when the majority was unanimous
○ Task difficulty: more difficult tasks increase conformity levels
● Perrin & Spender (1980): repeated Asch’s study with engineering students in the UK → only
one student conformed in 396 trials
○ Engineering students → felt more confident with answers
○ 1950s were more conformist
○ - Asch effect is not consistent across different time periods
● Artificial situation and task: demand characteristics could have occured
○ Task of identifying lines is relatively trivial and had no real reason to conform
○ - Findings cannot be generalised to everyday situations
● Limited application of findings
○ Only tested male participants → Neto (1995) says women may be more conformist
○ - Limited generalisability as they are only applicable to American men
● Findings only apply to certain situations: had to answer out loud (wanted to impress)
○ Williams and Sogon (1984): higher conformity rates when majority were friends
○ - Conformity levels depend on situation, lacks mundane realism (artificial setting)
● Ethical issues: participants were deceived → they thought confederates were participants
○ - Can lead to a distrust of the discipline of psychologists

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller parimahe. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

65040 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you

Class notes ·

(0)

behavior therapy

Summary ·

(0)

pn3 exam 2

Package deal ·

(0)

hsc exam

Package deal ·

(0)

Geriatrie

Summary ·

(0)

Hoofdstuk 3

Summary ·

(0)

chapter 9 review

$3.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added