100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
The Eiffel Tower $4.34   Add to cart

Essay

The Eiffel Tower

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

There is explained how the Eiffel Tower could be historicized through both prisms discussed in Lecture 5 (transfers) and Lecture 6 (the "post"). The arguments are based on the readings and the lectures. Rely on the readings from week 5 and week 6 and also on our discussions during the lectures.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • September 9, 2024
  • 2
  • 2023/2024
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • 6-7
avatar-seller
Assignment 4
One of Paris's most iconic examples of creative architecture is the Eiffel Tower.
When observing the Eiffel tower, most people won't immediately understand the
extent of its influence on modern civilization. Engineering and construction were
forever altered by the Eiffel Tower.1 However, it also has ideological undertones that
are firmly ingrained in the French sociopolitical milieu of the late 19th century. The
tower became a statement of pride and national identity as well as a symbol of
modernity when the nation commemorated the 100th anniversary of the French
Revolution. The Eiffel Tower represents the movement of architectural and
ideological concepts through place and time. By using the lens of “transfer” this
change in the engineering and construction area can be investigated
thoroughly. Simultaneously, seeing the tower via the lens of the "post" enables us to
comprehend its importance concerning more extensive historical settings and
modern perspectives.

As already stated, the Eiffel Tower has had a big influence on society we know today.
This is mainly because the Eiffel tower set an example for all constructions that were
yet to come.2 It was constructed in 1889 for the Exposition Universelle in Paris. The
Eiffel Tower is a magnificent example of engineering expertise and construction
practices transferred through time.3 The tower, which was created by Gustave Eiffel's
team, demonstrated France's industrial expertise, and challenged conventional
building techniques with its creative use of wrought iron.4 The tower's complex lattice
construction serves as a testament to this technology transfer, which impacted global
architectural practices in the years that followed.5 As nations looked to exhibit their
accomplishments on the international scene in the late 19th century, the tower's
construction also represented a wider exchange of ideas about progress and
modernity. This technological transfer was not only a declaration of advancement and
creativity, but it was also a construction achievement. The tower's conception and
construction had a lasting impact on later generations of engineers and architects,
establishing new benchmarks for the use of metal in massive constructions. The
lattice structure of the Eiffel Tower deviated from traditional masonry construction and
was based on iron truss engineering concepts. The building business was
revolutionized by its efficient assembly methods provided by its prefabricated
components and modular design. The Eiffel Tower served as a symbol of technology
transfer that aided in the global dissemination of superior engineering procedures
and influenced the advancement of contemporary architecture and construction
methods. The Eiffel Tower also represented a transfer of cultural and ideological
values in addition to its technological advances. The tower represented France's
hopes for both pride in its own country and recognition abroad. The Cultural
transmission the Eiffel Tower embodied emphasizes its role as a symbol of cultural
exchange and universal recognition.



1 De Oliveira, Patrick, "Eiffel and the Telling of Technological Stories," Age of Revolutions. May 23, 2022.
Accessed March 22, 2024, https://ageofrevolutions.com/2022/05/23/eiffel-and-the-telling-of-technological-
stories/.
2 Levin, Miriam R, “The Eiffel Tower Revisited,” The French Review 62, no. 6 (1989): 1052–1053,

http://www.jstor.org/stable/394841.
3 De Oliveira, Patrick, "Eiffel and the," Age of Revolutions.
4 De Oliveira, Patrick, "Eiffel and the," Age of Revolutions.
5 De Oliveira, Patrick, "Eiffel and the," Age of Revolutions.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gigijasminema. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.34. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62555 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.34
  • (0)
  Add to cart