100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Personal Assignement Philosophy $7.78   Add to cart

Other

Personal Assignement Philosophy

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This document consists of the answers of the following questions: 1) At the bottom of page 154, Wiredu describes how philosophical universalism should protect itself against parochialism. What is parochialism, and why should an intercultural philosopher try to overcome it? 2) What is concep...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • September 9, 2024
  • 2
  • 2023/2024
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
PSA 2 – Gigi Emanuels 2788761



Parochialism refers to a narrow-mindedness or limited perspective that is centered around
one's own local or restricted environment, often at the expense of a broader, more inclusive
view. In the context of intercultural philosophy, parochialism can manifest as an overly
narrow or ethnocentric approach that fails to appreciate or engage with diverse cultural
perspectives. Wiredu argues that an intercultural philosopher should strive to overcome
parochialism for several reasons. Firstly, parochialism limits one's understanding and
engagement with different cultural perspectives, hindering the ability to appreciate the
richness and diversity of human thought. By overcoming parochialism, philosophers can
broaden their horizons and engage in a more inclusive dialogue with ideas from various
cultures. Secondly, Wiredu suggests that parochialistic universalism may be a result of
historical factors, such as the success of Western philosophical traditions intertwined with
colonialism, religion, and education. Overcoming parochialism becomes crucial to avoid
perpetuating biased perspectives that may have originated from historical circumstances.
Thirdly, Wiredu emphasizes that philosophical insight is not exclusive to any specific race,
culture, or creed. Recognizing the universality of philosophical insights across cultures
challenges the notion that one cultural perspective has a monopoly on wisdom. This
understanding supports the idea that philosophical ideas can be shared and mutually
enriching across diverse cultural backgrounds.

Conceptual decolonization, according to Wiredu, is the suggestion that individuals should
not automatically accept Western ideas over indigenous ones unless there are good reasons
to do so. It is a call for a critical evaluation of ideas, urging individuals not to unquestioningly
adopt Western philosophical concepts but to consider them in light of their own cultural and
intellectual traditions. This approach aligns with the principle of independent considerations,
which suggests that intellectual choices should be determined by considerations
independent of language or culture. In my opinion, a holistic approach to intercultural
philosophy would involve both conceptual decolonization and an interdisciplinary
perspective. While conceptual decolonization addresses the philosophical ideas themselves,
an interdisciplinary approach broadens the scope by including insights from other
disciplines, such as history, sociology, anthropology, and empirical sciences. This
multifaceted approach enhances the richness of intercultural philosophy, providing a more
comprehensive understanding of the cultural, historical, and empirical contexts that shape
philosophical ideas. Integrating both conceptual decolonization and interdisciplinary
perspectives can contribute to a more nuanced and well-rounded intercultural philosophical
dialogue.

To transcend a cultural sense of philosophical self-sufficiency hindering intercultural
orientation, Western philosophers can undertake practical measures. Firstly, they can
establish inclusive research networks that bring together scholars from diverse backgrounds.
These networks should encourage collaborative efforts on global issues, fostering dialogue
beyond Western-centric perspectives. Secondly, a critical reevaluation of publication and
recognition practices is essential. Criteria for academic acknowledgment should be revised
to ensure equitable representation of diverse philosophical perspectives. This involves

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gigijasminema. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.78. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62555 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.78
  • (0)
  Add to cart