100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
PRACTICE RBC 1 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 2 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 3 TEST BRANDNEW EXAM WITH 250 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS) [ALREADY GRADED A+] $19.99
Add to cart
PRACTICE RBC 1 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 2 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 3 TEST BRANDNEW EXAM WITH 250 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS) [ALREADY GRADED A+]
2 views 0 purchase
Course
PRACTICE RBC 1 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 2 TEST, PRACTIC
Institution
PRACTICE RBC 1 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 2 TEST, PRACTIC
PRACTICE RBC 1 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 2 TEST,
PRACTICE RBC 3 TEST BRANDNEW EXAM WITH 250
QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
(VERIFIED ANSWERS) [ALREADY GRADED A+]
Brian and Ken planned to rob a bank. They decided that Brian would drive
the getaway car, and Ken would run into the bank and ...
Brian and Ken planned to rob a bank. They decided that Brian would drive
the getaway car, and Ken would run into the bank and steal the money.
They successfully robbed the bank and drove off with the stolen money.
Who would be the principal(s) of this crime? - Both Brian and Ken are
principals to the robbery, and they are equally culpable for the charge of
robbery.
A crowd of gang members attacked a member of a rival gang. The victim
was knocked to the ground and kicked repeatedly in the head with heavy
boots. The victim died from severe head trauma.
Only the gang member that killed the rival gang member is guilty of murder.
True or False - False - Each of the participants in the assault is a principal
,2|Page
to murder. It makes no difference which gang member struck the killing
blow since each of them is liable for the natural and foreseeable
consequences of the brutal attack.
Julia accidentally picked up someone else's coat when she quickly left a
meeting. Julia is able to show that she intended to leave with her own very
similar coat. Julia returned the coat.
What crime, if any, occurred? - none - Julia has not committed a crime; she
has made a mistake.
An adult male held to answer for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor
female presented evidence that he had a good faith, reasonable belief
based on the girl's appearance, actions, and representations that she was
18 years old and a voluntary participant in the act.
Is the male still guilty? - No - there is no criminal intent because the
defendant reasonably believed that the female had reached the age of
consent
,3|Page
A sober person driving a vehicle in good mechanical condition was
traveling within the posted speed limit on a dry, clear day. Without warning,
a pedestrian darted out from behind a parked car in the middle of the block
and into the path of the vehicle. The car struck and injured the pedestrian.
what crime, if any, did the driver commit? - None - The injury was
unintentional with no evil design (intent) on the part of the driver
A woman, defending herself against an unprovoked attack, punched her
assailant in the head. The blow caused the assailant to fall onto a sharp
object, resulting in the assailant's death.
The woman committed murder. True or False? - False - The woman did not
have criminal intent,
therefore, did not commit a crime.
Upon approaching a convenience store late at night, Frank was stopped in
the parking lot by a man with a gun. The man gave Frank an unloaded
pistol and ordered him to rob the convenience store. The man tells Frank
that he would be watching him through the window and would "cap him" if
, 4|Page
he didn't rob the store. Frank robbed the store and gave the gunman the
proceeds.
Frank is not guilty of armed robbery. True or False? - True - Frank has
acted under threat or menace and lacks the criminal intent necessary for
him to be guilty of a crime.
A man went to the home of his estranged wife to discuss a problem they
were having over their property settlement. An argument broke out and the
man slapped his wife and then told her he would come back and "really
beat you up" if she reported the incident to the local law enforcement.
What crime, if any, was committed? - Intimidating Witnesses or Victims -
Felony
At a trial for embezzlement, Bill testified against the
defendant, his former business partner. Two days later, while the jury was
deliberating, Bill received a letter from the defendant stating "you'll be sorry
for what you did." The letter also stated that the business they had formerly
owned together would be "torched."
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller edwinnyamoita. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $19.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
