Exam (elaborations)
CPMSM - KEY CREDENTIALING CASES TEST LATEST UPDATED
- Course
- Institution
CPMSM - KEY CREDENTIALING CASES TEST LATEST UPDATED...
[Show more]
Content preview
CPMSM - KEY CREDENTIALING CASES TESTLATEST UPDATED
Darling v. Charleston Memorial Community Hospital - ANSWER Failure to
provide enough supervision; case overturned the Charitable Immunity Doctrine.
Hospital responsible for negligent care that resulted in the amputation of a
teenager's limb; nurses failed to monitor; physician neglected to consult; hospital
claimed charitable immunity concept restricted damages to insurance.
Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital - Answer Negative credentialing;
failure of the original credentialing process.
Hospitals accountable for patient injuries caused by physicians who failed to
disclose pending malpractice cases and misled about privileges at other hospitals;
should have verified information.
Elam v. College Park Hospital: ANSWER Negligent Credentialing
The hospital is culpable for the podiatrist's negligence; it neglected to gather
malpractice claims data while being aware of the claims by the medical records
department. Podiatrist.
Patrick v. Burget - ANSWER Anti-competitive peer review; HCQIA; violation of
federal antitrust laws.
Physicians who conducted peer reviews for anti-competitive purposes may have
violated federal antitrust statutes.
, Robinson v. Magovern - ANSWER Hospitals May Establish Proper Competition
Limitations Within the Hospital and Surrounding Areas - Adherence to bylaws
including objective criteria is essential. Denial of an application does not constitute
a trade constraint.
MD filed an antitrust lawsuit because he was denied privileges. The hospital made
this decision due to a lack of OR space, a negative recommendation, the failure to
publish MD on seven other staff members, and the likelihood that they would be
unable to participate to the hospital's teaching program.
Miller v. Eisenhower Medical Center - Answer: Disruptive behavior must be
related to patient care.
Denial of application due to incapacity to collaborate with others; no quality of care
issues.
Rao v. Auburn General Hospital - Answer: Disruptive Behavior. Personality may
be considered if it affects ability to practice or hospital operations - personality
issues must have an impact on how the hospital operates.
After obtaining allegations of termination/restricted privileges from other
institutions, the hospital denied MD privileges. Other hospitals noted subpar work
and mental instability.
Boyd v. Albert Einstein Medical Center - Answer MCO is accountable for
practitioners' actions.
An IPA-type HMO that represented itself as providing medical care was held
accountable for a member MD's negligence.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller luzlinkuz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now