100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
WGU C963 - Court Cases - American Politics and the US Constitution $11.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

WGU C963 - Court Cases - American Politics and the US Constitution

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • WGU C963
  • Institution
  • WGU C963

WGU C963 - Court Cases - American Politics and the US Constitution

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • September 11, 2024
  • 3
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • WGU C963
  • WGU C963
avatar-seller
AGRADEPROMASTER
WGU C963 - Court Cases - American Politics and the US Constitution
h h h h h h h h h h h


Studyhonlinehathhttps://quizlet.com/_95e38n
1. Marbury v. Madison (1803): Established judicial review. The courts have thep
h h h h h h h h h h h


ower to strike down laws that they find to violate the Constitution.
h h h h h h h h h h h


2. Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857): The Constitution was not meant to include Amer-
h h h h h h h h h h h h


ican citizenship for black people.
h h h h h


3. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): Separate but equal - h h h h h h h


hRacial segregation laws for public facilities are Constitutional as long as the segrega
h h h h h h h h h h h h


ted facilities were equal inquality.
h h h h h


4. United States v. Miller (1939): Upheld The National Firearms Act of 1934 allow-
h h h h h h h h h h h h


ing the government to ban interstate shipping of some unregistered guns unrelatedto
h h h h h h h h h h h h h h


state militias h


5. Korematsu v. United States (1944): Japanese internment is legal holding that th h h h h h h h h h h h


e need to protect against espionage by Japan outweighed the rights of Americansof Ja
h h h h h h h h h h h h h h


panese descent. h


6. Brown v. Board of Education (1954): State laws establishing racial segregationin
h h h h h h h h h h h h


public schools were unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwiseequ
h h h h h h h h h h h


al in quality. h h


7. Mapp v. Ohio (1961): Held that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutorsfro
h h h h h h h h h h h h


m using evidence in court that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment,appli
h h h h h h h h h h h h h


es to the states. h h h


8. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): In criminal cases, states are required under theSi
h h h h h h h h h h h h


xth Amendment to provide an attorney to defendants who are unable to afford their
h h h h h h h h h h h h h h


own.
9. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): The court spelled out the right to privacy for the f
h h h h h h h h h h h h h h


irst time in a case that struck down a state law forbidding married couples fromusing a
h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h


ny form of contraception.
h h h


10. Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Detained criminal suspects, prior to police ques- h h h h h h h h h h


tioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self
h h h h h h h h h h h h h h


-incrimination.
11. Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966): Virginia's poll tax was unconsti-
h h h h h h h h h h h


tutional under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
h h h h h h h h h h


12. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969): Students have the right to symbolic speech atsc
h h h h h h h h h h h h h


hool as long as it is not disruptive.
h h h h h h h


13. Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969): Speech advocating illegal conduct is protectedu h h h h h h h h h h


nder the First Amendment unless the speech is likely to incite "imminent lawlessacti
h h h h h h h h h h h h h


on."
14. Miller v. California (1973): Obscenity test. Community standards should be use
h h h h h h h h h h


d to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a "prurientinteres
h h h h h h h h h h h h h h


t" and being "patently offensive" and lacking in value.
h h h h h h h h




1h/h3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller AGRADEPROMASTER. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart