100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Case law summary Regulating Competition $4.32   Add to cart

Judgments

Case law summary Regulating Competition

 103 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of the case law - course Regulating Competition

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • December 10, 2019
  • 8
  • 2019/2020
  • Judgments
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
COMP Cases

Mergers:

Siemens/Alstom:
parties’ reationale: would enable the Merged Entity to compete effectively at global level in
the future and respond to tomorrow's mobility challenges while addressing the increasing
competitive pressure from rapidly growing (Asian) competitors, to the benefit of customers
and consumers

Adidas/Reebok

- Importance of market definition
- Different market have constraining effects on each other

(iv) Risks of coordinated effects
48. Finally, the Commission has also assessed whether the merger could give rise to
coordinated effects detrimental to consumers. Although the merger increases the market
shares’ symmetry between the two leading players, i.e. Nike and Adidas, the features of the
market, most notably the volatility of market shares due to the fashion driven, differentiated
nature of the products, as well as the presence of a large number of dynamic competitors
capable of exercising very significant competitive constraints, rule out the risks of collusion on
the market resulting from the operation.

Conclusion
49. Therefore, on the basis of the foregoing and given in particular the different positioning of
Adidas and Reebok on the market, the number of strong competitors present in all categories
and price points where Adidas and Reebok are concentrated, the fact that in some instances
shoes from a sport and leisure categories constrain the pricing of other sport categories of
athletic shoes, the Commission concludes that the transaction as notified does not raise serious
doubts as to its compatibility with the Common market.

RyanAir/AirLingus

- Market share can be useful first indicators, as long as this is not the only evidence
- Importance of the close competitor test
- Commission needs to use economic evidence
- Commission can use information from board meetings etc to evaluate the merger
- Potential competitors need to operate in the same market in order to be taken into
account
- Evaluation of switching costs/ barriers can be done by consumer surveys
- Entry barriers to competitors: (plane charter, base in Ireland, risks to entry, aggressive
response by Ryanair, more routes besides Ireland, landing slots)

, - Mere threat of entry is not enough – needs also be timely and likely
- COM needs to take economic business models of firms into account (para. 30)
- Efficiencies of the merger
o Benefit for consumer
o Merger specific
o Verifiable
- Up for the parties to show efficiencies
o COM needs to verify them
o Only if above 3 fulfilled and they outweigh anti competitive risk may a merger be
cleared
- Same for commitments
“the mere ‘threat’ of an entry, on which the applicant relies, is not sufficient… What counts is
the prospect of an entrant which offsets the anti-competitive effects specifically established in
the contested decision at that stage of the assessment.” [239]


Lufthansa

- When reviewing commitments, COM needs to take only relevant factors into account
- Court might quash a part of the COM decision
- Commission is saying it is not regulating, but in fact it does




102 Abuse of a dominant position

United Brands (HC 8)

- Definition what is a dominant position
- Bananas is a different product market than fresh fruit (today not applicable anymore)
- Prohibiting ripeners to sell bananas while green is an abuse of 102
o However, only protects competitors really
o Also partitions the market (illegal)
o Affects trade between MS
- Refusal to supply a long term customer is an abuse
o Only really protects the competitors again
o Also compare with Magill/IMS Health

Michelin

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Henkie33. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.32. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

61001 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.32
  • (0)
  Add to cart