HY113: Extra-European World In The Twentieth Century (HY113)
Exam (elaborations)
High quality LSE history essay - how to get to a first
5 views 0 purchase
Course
HY113: Extra-European World In The Twentieth Century (HY113)
Institution
London School Of Economics (LSE)
Document contains an exemplar HY113 essay with department marksheet and professor's review. The essay focuses on analysis of key actors in Indian independence and was rewarded a 69. As mentioned in the marking, better citation formatting would have pushed it up to a first. Improve your chances of a...
HY113: Extra-European World In The Twentieth Century (HY113)
All documents for this subject (5)
Seller
Follow
Floatingbeaver
Content preview
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL HISTORY
Feedback on Assessed (Summative) Essay
STUDENT ……………………. COURSE HY113
TEACHER ……….. CLASS GROUP \
TOPIC
Focus & Range
Unsatisfactory The discussion stays focused on the discussion except for some of the
preamble at the start of each section, which does not contribute to the
Satisfactory answer
Good x
Excellent use of detailed content to support the discussion
Excellent x
Structure & Coherence
Unsatisfactory Essay outline could be clearer, to explain the division of content.
Satisfactory x
Good
Excellent
Depth of Analysis & Quality of Arguments
Unsatisfactory x Intro
Attempts road map, though could be clearer. No summary of the debate
Satisfactory fault-lines in the historiography. Argument is presented, but it is vague and
could be stated more clearly (don’t be afraid to use ‘this essay argues’-see
Good x comments on the essay)
Main body
Excellent x
Some excellent points and analysis.
Uses an excellent range of specific detail to support the analytical
discussion, developing sophisticated arguments in each section
Conclusion Very good summary of the key arguments. However, this
could have gone even further by engaging the historiography.
Despite the excellent discussion and use of detailed content, the essay
is missing direct engagement with the historiography.
1
, Use of Sources & Historiography
Unsatisfactory X Content from the literature is effectively referenced to support the
discussion, but there is no direct engagement whatsoever with the
scholarship/historiography. What have others said/argued on this
Satisfactory question? Where does your argument lie within the existing debates?
Good x
Excellent
Expression & Presentation
Unsatisfactory Avoid the first person- see essay
Some phrasing issues throughout-check your tenses-see essay
Satisfactory X comments.
Good
Excellent
Suggestions for Improvement & Other Points
PROVISIONAL mark: 69% Signature:
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Floatingbeaver. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $26.63. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
