100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Trials of Communism Lectures Guide $5.89   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Trials of Communism Lectures Guide

1 review
 62 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This guide travels through the lectures and seminar readings, week by week, in a clear and structured way. Allowing you to understand all the knowledge of the Trials of Communism course from Eastern European Studies Major of European Studies BA. For the exam, this is especially useful, due to the f...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 22  pages

  • December 18, 2019
  • 22
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: daneeheuvel1 • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
TRAILS OF COMMUNISM REVISION GUIDE – LECTURES


Lecture 1: How Political Trials Shape Political Order
Lawyers VS Historian’s Perspective:
 Political trials can be seen as a way of describing certain political changes and
processes
 Political trials can be seen as a tool to observe societal changes
 Political trials can be seen as an illustration of cultural representations
Therefore, through different lenses, different types of scholars can explore political trials in
different ways
Actors in a Political Trial  Judge, Defendant and Prosecutor
There is a common notion of political trials as a theatre; looking at the role of the state as an
actor in a trial
Antiquity political trials
Socrates  accused of destabilizing the system by indoctrinating the youth
Jesus  accused and convicted of blasphemy
Joan of Arc  accused and convicted of blasphemy
Galileo  accused of heresy, as his heliocentric model delegitimized the church
Post-War situations
These concern trials that came about after the end of wars
The Alsace-Lorraine Affair surfaced after the end of the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, and
public intervention in this case changed the course of this trial
The political trial had influence of Theodor Herzl, who came up with the necessity of a
Jewish state during the Alsace-Lorraine Trials
The Eichmann Trial of 1961 occurred after the end of the Holocaust and WW2 and was the
first trial that was widely televised

,The ideology behind political trials
Trials are presented with an air of morality and secured by the legitimacy of law and
legislation
Ron Christenson wrote a book type-coding political trials into 4 categories:
1. Trails of public responsibility  the trials of corruption or against public privacy
2. Trials of dissenters  State VS Individual
3. Trials of nationalists  The majority VS the minority
4. Trials of regimes  occurring after a period of political transition
Christenson argues that even though there is a semblance of legitimacy in political trials,
there is an ongoing subconscious debate centred around responsibility, morality and
representation
The trail as a narrative also comes into play as they centre around didactic tales  thereby
the public uses these narratives to shape their view of society
Lecture 2: Post WW2 Retributions
After WW2, there was a sense of public duty and responsibility to rid non-German
territories of German people, even if they were former citizens
Mass-scale reprisals occurred directed against war criminals, collaborators and German
people
Some forms of retribution included:
1. Vigilante violence
2. People’s Tribunals  local level
3. Military and State Courts  larger cities aimed at punishing more important war
criminals
4. International Tribunals  Approved by the Allied powers for significant Nazi
perpetrators
East/Central Europe
Here we see a mass expulsion of Germans; specifically, in Poland, Czechoslovakia and
Hungary where they followed the lateral of state law
12 to 14 million Germans were expelled from East-Central Europe, which added to the mass
social mobility of the Jews as well
Most of the violence was directed against those who were seen as perpetrators of the war
and included: mass violence, looting, hangings and mass suicides
It can also be said that the realities of expulsions can be seen as a form of punishment in its
own right; as Germans faced forced labour, transport camps and dire living conditions
All these processes of violence and condemnation against the Germans can be seen as a
form of ‘victor’s justice’

, The Planning of Expulsions
The planning started much later than the end of the war, as during the war governments in
exile (mainly position in London) discussed post-war order
In 1941, Czechoslovakia’s President in Exile (Edvard Benes) published an article titled ‘New
Order in Europe’ outlining the expulsion of German people and describing all Germans (even
those who were anti-Nazi) as passive war criminals; highlighting the culpability of everyone
In 1942, there was an extermination of the population of Lidice by the Nazi and German
forced  Benes used this to demonize the entire German nation
Expulsions as human rights violations
German expulsions are currently seen as human rights violations as the punishments were
not in proportion to any crimes they may or may not have committed
Violence was omnipresent in the early post-war years
Before official expulsion occurred, one can note the development of wild expulsions by non-
Germans, highlighting a mob mentality
Czechoslovakia
The Sudetenland in the West of Czechoslovakia were populated with a 95% German
population
During expulsions, they were expelled to Western Germany and new settlers came from
internal Czechoslovakia to take their homes
German Sudetens were easy to identify because of their heavy accent or lack of capability
speaking the local language
Some Germans were allowed to stay as their expert knowledge could be applied to
industrial sector growth
Benes claimed that “Germans are to blame, they caused it themselves, we are justified and
have the whole world on our side”  thus framing expulsions under a global peace banner
The Czechoslovak press shaped the cultural memory of Germans as something that was
unwanted and using this rhetoric to justify violent expulsions
Local press was eager and enthusiastic to report the expulsions of Germans from local and
regional areas
 Exemptions
1. German-Speaking Jews  they had to show loyalty to local regimes, and if they
declared themselves as German on the 1930 nationality census they were expelled
2. Germans in mixed marriages
3. Antifascists  this category was hard to identify
4. Experts  e.g business owners

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller halliestevenson98. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.89
  • (1)
  Add to cart