100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Social influence summary $5.21   Add to cart

Summary

Social influence summary

 13 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A cheat sheet/ summary of social influences containing AO1 and AO3 information giving strengths and weaknesses. This covers: explanations of conformity, Asch, Milgram and psychological factors of obedience. I received an A grade in my psychology Alevel

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • September 25, 2024
  • 2
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Explanations of conformity Asch Milgram Psychological factors of obedience
*Normative social influence = want *Tested compliance and majority *Tested obedience in a lab *agentic state =
to be liked, emotional process. When person acts on behalf of
influence in a lab setting setting authority figure of higher status, does
happens around strangers & leads *123 American male students, *40 male participants paid not take responsibility for actions as
to compliance.
each tested with 6-8 (teacher) & two confederates they’re acting for someone else
*Informational social influence =
confederates (learner & experimenter) *autonomous state = responsible for
want to be right, cognitive process. own actions
happens in new situations & leads *perception test, identify length *learner answers memory test
*agentic shift =
to internalisation. of standard line questions & shocked every time When someone changes from
*Compliance = *12/18 trials, confederates said it was wrong autonomous to agentic state
Publicly agreeing but privately wrong answer *pp prodded to shock learner in *legitimacy of authority =
disagreeing 15 volt increments When person recognises their own &
*Internalisation = *75% conformed at least one, *12.5% stopped at 300v, 65% other’s position in social hierarchy,
legitimacy is increased using visual
Permanent change of opinion, 37% conformed every time shocked full 450v symbols like uniform.
without group presence. Publicly &
privately agreeing
+ NSI = Asch. found that participants would + good internal validity/lab =strict + good external validity = Hofflings + research support = students
state incorrect answer when surrounded by control over extraneous variables nurses – 95% or nurses obeyed blamed experimenter rather than
group of strangers. interviewed, stated that
reason why was bc wanting to be liked by - cultural bias = smith & bond = doctor over the phone to increase pp. because of legitimacy of
group. support idea of NSI being reason for conformity rates higher in dosage of a patient’s medicine to authority. Recognised legitimate
conformity. collectivist cultures, Fiji high levels double what is advised. Milgram’s authority as cause of obedience
- NSI = individual differences not considered, of conformity, Belgium low levels can generalise - obedience alibi = agentic shift
nAffiliators test = McGhee & Teevan found
students who were nAffiliators were more
- temporal validity = perrin & - ethical issues = deception, harm, cannot account for behaviour of the
likely to conform. Assumes everyone is spencer criticised as 1950’s were right to withdraw. Cost/benefit Nazis – gives people an excuse e.g.
affected by NSI the same way but are not conformist time in America. - lack internal validity = demand german reserve police shot civilians
engineering students in 1980 only characteristics, guessed shocks were without being given direct orders to
+ ISI = Lucas et al. difficult maths questions, found 1/396 conforming result fake + research support = plane crash
more conformity to answers when problems
were difficult & people with low confidence - ethical issues = pps were deceived +good external validity = French study
- ISI = Perrin & Spencer engineering students however cost should be weighed game show, pps paid to give electric - low ecological validity = Hofling’s
= less conformity bc they have more with benefit of the study shock to actors, 80% gave max 450v, nurses should have shown anxiety
knowledge & more confident supports findings

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller elliedillinger. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

80796 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$5.21
  • (0)
  Add to cart