Exam (elaborations)
CBP OFFICER ENTRANCE EXAM
- Course
- Institution
CBP OFFICER ENTRANCE EXAM
[Show more]
Content preview
CBP OFFICER ENTRANCE EXAMSome 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain country in 1999. Although most of
these immigrants were not employed in professional occupations, many of them were.
For instance, many of them were engineers and many of them were nurses. Very few of
these immigrants were librarians, another professional occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly concluded that, in 1999, in the country
described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were immigrants
C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants - Answers -D) Some of the engineers were
immigrants
Despite the fact that HIV is not easily transmitted, its deadly potential requires that law
enforcement officers protect themselves from becoming infected by it. At the Callen
Precinct, officers use only disposable items for collection evidence whenever blood is
present, While investigating a particular crime scene where blood was present,
Detective R.C. of the Callen Precinct used only disposable items for collecting evidence.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, when collecting
evidence at a crime scene:
A) Detective R.C. does not always use disposable items when blood is present
B) Whenever blood is not present, Detective R.C. does not use only disposable items
C) Detective R.C. uses only disposable items whenever blood is not present
D) No officers at the Callen Precinct use non-disposable items whenever blood is
present - Answers -D) No officers at the Callen Precinct use non-disposable items
whenever blood is present
Impressions made by the ridges on the ends of the fingers and thumbs are useful
means of identification, since no two persons have the same pattern of ridges. If finger
patterns from fingerprints are not decipherable, then they cannot be classified by
general shape and contour or by pattern type. If they cannot be classified by these
characteristics, then it is impossible to identify the person to whom the fingerprints
belong.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly concluded that:
, A) If it is possible to identify the person to whom fingerprints belong, then the
fingerprints are decipherable
B) If finger patterns from fingerprints are not decipherable, then it is impossible to
identify the person to whom the fingerprints belong
C) If fingerprints are decipherable, then it is impossible to identify the person to whom
they belong
D) If fingerprints can be classified by general shape and contour - Answers -C) If
fingerprints are decipherable, then it is impossible to identify the person to whom they
belong
A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general public at
published rates. As a common carrier, the trucking company is liable for any cargo
damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the company can
demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast,
a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is
only responsible for cargo damage spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-
trailer, acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident that damaged
its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was
involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, in reference to the
accident:
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent - Answers -C) If Claus
Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance
on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances
of conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some
investigation, access to ALL e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files
and messages outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In
spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face-
to-face or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly concluded that:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of investigations have
contained messages that would neve be said face-to-face
B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail
messages
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GEEKA. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $12.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
83100 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now