& updated
Three principles of Belmont Report - ANSWER-Respect for Persons
Beneficence
Justice
The Belmont Report
Principle of Beneficence - ANSWER-MAXIMIZATION of benefits and
MINIMIZATION of risks
T/F
Belmont Report indicates it is necessary to rigorously avoid conflicts of interest -
ANSWER-TRUE
The Belmont Report
Respect for Person - ANSWER-Requires that subjects freely choose to participate
in research (voluntariness) and that they are adequately informed about a study
(informed consent)
The Belmont Report defines and delineates... - ANSWER-"Practice" and
"Research"
The Belmont Report
The Principle of Justice - ANSWER-Research benefit and burden distribution and
that selection of subjects is fair.
T/F
The Belmont report describes the necessity to effectively manage conflicts of
interest - ANSWER-FALSE
, Students in Research
The history of ethical regulations in human subjects research began with the -
ANSWER-Nuremberg Code
Nuremberg Code - ANSWER-Human subjects research guidelines and regulations
Year of the Nuremberg Code - ANSWER-1949
Additional resources regarding IRB approval process - ANSWER-Faculty
advisor/Research Mentor
IRB office
Human subjects research websites
What element must be included in an informed consent? - ANSWER-All
foreseeable risks and discomforts
Which type of IRB review does not require and IRB approval but DOES require a
Determination by the IRB? - ANSWER-If the study qualifies for EXEMPTION
Another name for the "Exempt" status - ANSWER-the Common Rule
stated in Title 45 Part 46 Subpart A
How can faculty researchers avoid coercion of student subjects? - ANSWER-
Avoid using their own students in their research
Name the type of Review: Research study that involves use of educational tests,
survey, interviews, or observations of public behavior without identifiable
information. - ANSWER-Exempt Review category 2
Name the type of review: A study involving data collected that could have an
impact on human subject's careers and it contains identifiers of the subjects. -
ANSWER-Full Board Review
Type of review that qualifies if no identification of subjects and/or their responses
would reasonably place them at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to
the subjects financial standing, employability, insurability, reputation, or be
stigmatizing, unless reasonable and appropriate protections will be implemented
so that risks related to invasion of privacy and breach of confidentiality are no
greater than minimal - ANSWER-Expedited review