Exam (elaborations)
PHIL347N: Week 6 Quiz
- Course
- Institution
PHIL347N: Week 6 Quiz
[Show more]
Content preview
PHIL347N: Week 6 Quiz Questions AndAnswers
v 1. What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? - a. Comparative reasoning
b. Empirical reasoning
c. Ideological reasoning
What is comparative reasoning? On what skill is it based? - Comparative reasoning is this-is-like that
reasoning. We rely on something familiar to interpret and understand something that is less familiar. It is
based on pattern recognition.
We learned four tests for evaluating arguments: truthfulness of the premises, logical strength, relevance,
and non-circularity. How well do these tests work with respect to evaluation comparative reasoning?
Consider each of the four tests - a. The four tests of evaluating arguments do not work well in evaluative
comparative reasoning because it does not seek to determine whether a conclusion is true or not.
b. Truth of the premises does not work because points of comparison are not connected in a way that
permits us to say one is more true than another
c. Logical strength reveals point of similarity and dissimilarity that make comparisons more or less
plausible, rather than logical or illogical.
d. Relevance is not easily apparent; the argument offers observations to establish relevance
e. Non-circularity does not apply because comparative inferences flow from what we know to a
projection of what may be true
Briefly explain how we can determine if one comparison is more comprehensive that another - We can
determine if a comparison is more comprehensive by assessing which one captures a greater number of
essential features.
According to the text, the basic question to ask when evaluating a comparison between two objects or
ideas or events is "Are they alike enough in the important ways or not?". What are those "important
ways" that determine the credibility of conclusion based on similarities? - The five criteria for evaluating
comparative reasoning are familiarity, simplicity, comprehensiveness, productivity, and testability.
In your own words, define empirical reasoning - Empirical reasoning is inductive and based on
observations. It takes observations and "bottoms up" to predict probabilities.
What are the three defining characteristics of empirical reasoning? - a. Fundamentally inductive
b. Self-corrective
c. Open to scrutiny and independent verification
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller knowledgeNest. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now