100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Witness Credibility: Impeachment UPDATED Actual Exam Questions and CORRECT Answers $7.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Witness Credibility: Impeachment UPDATED Actual Exam Questions and CORRECT Answers

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Witness Credibility
  • Institution
  • Witness Credibility

Witness Credibility: Impeachment UPDATED Actual Exam Questions and CORRECT Answers "Past Recollection Refreshed" - CORRECT ANSWER- Witness may refer to a writing that contains information that may refresh their memory. Witness doesn't testify from the writing. Testimony must come from memory

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • October 5, 2024
  • 5
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Witness Credibility
  • Witness Credibility
avatar-seller
MGRADES
Witness Credibility: Impeachment
UPDATED Actual Exam Questions and
CORRECT Answers
"Past Recollection Refreshed" - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Witness may refer to a writing
that contains information that may refresh their memory. Witness doesn't testify from the
writing. Testimony must come from memory.


Cross-Exam: Writing Reviewed Before Hearing (General) - CORRECT ANSWER-
✔✔Cross-examiner: "Did you review any documents in preparation for this hearing?"
Witness: "Yes" then the lawyer can ask to see the documents
After review, lawyer can choose to cross-examine the witness regarding the writing(s) and/or
introduce any relevant portions of the writing into evidence


Cross-Exam: Writing Reviewed Before Hearing (CA rule) - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔In
CA court, the documents must be produced if requested


Cross-Exam: Writing Reviewed Before Hearing (Fed Rule) - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔In
Federal court, the court has discretion to order document's production


Cross-Exam: Writing Reviewed During Hearing Process - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔1.
Examiner may ask witness if a writing might refresh his memory
2. If yes, the lawyer presents the document to the witness
3. The witness reviews the document
4. The lawyer asks if the witness's recollection is refreshed
5. If yes, the lawyer proceeds with questioning, without using the writing


Methods of Impeachment: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Impeachment by:
Prior inconsistent statements; Contradiction; Character evidence; Prior criminal convictions;
Evidence of bias or interest; Evidence of improper motive; Demonstration of impaired
capacity to perceive, recollect or communicate

, Who May Impeach? - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Any party to the lawsuit may attack the
credibility of a witness (Even the party calling a witness)


CA Impeachment Rule: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔The credibility of a witness may be
attacked or supported by any party, including the party calling him.


Fed Impeachment Rule: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔The credibility of a witness may be
attacked by any party, including the party calling the witness


Difference between basic CA and Fed Impeachment: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔CA:
credibility can be attacked/supported
Fed: credibility can only be attacked.


Impeachment and Religious Beliefs: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Evidence regarding a
witness's religious beliefs cannot be used to either bolster or attack a witness's character


Impeachment and Religious Beliefs Exception: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Bias
(ex: evidence that witness and defendant are members of the same church may show that
witness has a bias in favor of defendant)


Prior Inconsistent Statements (PIS): - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔A statement that is different
from witness's statement at trial. May be written, or spoken. Used to show that the statement
during trial is not reliable


Ways of Introducing the PIS: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Confrontation
Via the testimony of another witness (allowed as impeached witness gets a chance to explain
or deny PIS)


PIS Witness CA Rule: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Witness must not have been excused
from further testimony at trial


PIS Witness Fed Rule: - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔The opposing party MUST have the
opportunity to examine the witness regarding the prior inconsistent statement

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MGRADES. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78834 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart